JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Effects of increasing cow urine deposition area on soil mineral nitrogen movement and pasture growth on a recent soil in the Manawatu region, New Zealand : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Management at Massey University, Manawatū, Palmerston North, New Zealand
The cow urine patch is a major source of nitrate (NO3¯) leaching from grazed dairy pasture
farms. Increasing the urine deposition area is a direct way of reducing the potential risk of
this cause N leaching losses. Research is required to quantity the effectiveness of this
mitigation across a range of different soil and climatic conditions. The objective of this
study was to determine the effect of increasing the cow urine deposition area on NO3¯
leaching risk and short-term pasture accumulation on Recent soil in the Manawatu Region,
New Zealand. A field trial was conducted, which consisted of three treatments evaluated
on pasture plots: Urine (1 m2), Urine (0.2 m2) and No-urine. The two urine treatments
received the same volume of 2.1 L urine/patch. Urine treatments were applied on the 6th of
March 2017, and soil inorganic N was measured on three occasions; 15, 36 and 53 days
after urine application (DAUA). At the third soil sampling time, which was 24 days after
the drainage season was estimated to have commenced, the net inorganic N (inorganic N in
the urine treatment minus the value for the No-urine treatment) in the 45-120 cm soil depth
was 1.08 g net inorganic N/patch for the Urine (1 m2) treatment compared to 2.97 g net
inorganic N/patch for the Urine (0.2 m2) treatment. Therefore, the Urine (1 m2) treatment
resulted in a 63.6% reduction in the quantity of net inorganic N that was highly susceptible
to leaching, compared to the more typical urine patch area of 0.2 m2. At a paddock scale,
when net inorganic N from the urine treatments is multiplied by an estimate of the quantity
of urine patches per hectare in a single grazing, this equates to a reduction of 2.53 kg N/ha
from a single autumn grazing. It is expected that increasing urine deposition area at
multiple grazings would result in greater reductions in the annual NO3¯ leaching risk.
Over the two pasture harvests conducted in the trial, the pasture DM accumulation for the
No-urine treatment produced an average of 3220 kg DM/ha. The two urine patch
treatments achieved a similar level of pasture DM accumulation to that of the No-urine
treatment. The lack of a pasture growth response from the added urine could have been
influenced by the high clover content (35.9%) of the pasture, and in addition, there may
have been adequate background soil mineral N levels, which together could have
contributed to N not being growth limiting during the trial.
This research has demonstrated that increasing cow urine deposition area in autumn has
potential to be an effective mitigation for decreasing N leaching losses from grazed dairy
pastures. Further research is required to investigate the effects of increasing cow urine
deposition area at multiple grazings, in order to determine the effect of this mitigation
option on annual NO3¯ leaching and pasture production.