How then could we live? Towards the pragmatic creation of sustainable ecological habitus in cities : a dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Management at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand
Loading...
Date
2018
Open Access Location
DOI
Authors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Massey University
Abstract
Creating ecologically sustainable ways of life is desirable, necessary, and urgent for the collective
future of life on Earth. Although this is acknowledged, aspired to, and increasingly pursued in
action, broad-scale sustainability remains unrealised. Western cities offer a strategic place to
exemplify and accelerate global sustainability transitions. Such cities are characterised by dense
human populations with excessive per capita resource use, but they can also be cornucopias of
economic development, progressive politics, and diverse culture and correspondingly act at global
hotspots of innovation and change.
This exploratory research proposes pragmatic backcasted pathways for furthering such change,
constructing future visions of more sustainable ways of life in Western cities, identifying presentday
barriers to realising these, and generating practical solutions ‘here and now’ that could
contribute strategically to overcoming the barriers, towards a sustainable future. An insight and
foresight rich distillation of evidence-based knowledge and practical experience was generated to
inform these pathways, through qualitative interviews with 25 esteemed experts specialising in
fields of socio-ecology and cities, including planning, design, sociology, psychology, philosophy,
art, activism, economics, and government.
To analyse this data and conceptualise alternative pathways, ‘ecological habitus’, an emergent
socio-ecological theory, was developed and employed as a practical framework for conceptually
linking broad-scale socio-ecological issues with everyday practice; analysing the inter-dependent
variables (e.g. normative, material, social, and psychological) of social reproduction and change;
and assessing their sustainability at different scales (e.g. individual and institutional). Two
components were added to the theory: ‘natural capital’ (the ecological/biophysical factors within
socio-ecological relationships), and ‘ecological reflexivity’ (people’s responses to natural capital
whether intentional-critical, periodic-conscious, or routine-subconscious). These enhance
ecological habitus as a versatile tool for socio-ecological and sustainability-transition research.
The ultimate research outcomes are three backcasted pathways towards a future of ‘sustainable
ecological habitus’, which could begin pragmatically with: collaborative practice among city
authorities to develop as ecologically-reflexive sustainability leaders and overcome disciplinary
silos; strategic enrichment of cities with accessible, place-based natural capital to enhance humannature
connection; and everyday self-, or socially-directed sustainability micro-interventions among
city-dwellers, to incrementally grow mainstream sustainable ecological habitus. These actions
combined could accelerate sustainable ecological habitus in Western cities and beyond. The power is
ours.
Description
Keywords
Sociology, Urban, Developed countries, Sustainable urban development, City planning, Environmental aspects, Urban policy, Urban renewal, Urban ecology (Sociology)