Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Samuel Andrew
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Samuel Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-20T23:36:34Z
dc.date.available2011-04-20T23:36:34Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/2290
dc.description.abstractThe major objective of this research is to critically examine the justification for government involvement in the construction of sports facilities and the hosting of major sport events in a New Zealand context. There has been an increased focus on the appropriateness of the involvement of government (at all levels) in such projects. Almost all sports‐related projects, including facility construction projects or the hosting of events, have been justified by ex‐ante economic impact studies that predict the creation of jobs and income generation as outcomes that accrue to host economies. The research within this thesis seeks to answer several questions that contribute to the overall research objective. Firstly, a case study example of Wellington’s Westpac Stadium is analysed with a view to examining whether local and regional government involvement in the construction of the stadium was justified on economic impact grounds. The research then focuses on evaluating the ex‐post economic impacts of sports projects in a panel context across New Zealand. Realised outcomes of facility construction and the hosting of internationally oriented events are estimated through the development of models for territorial local authority (TLA) sector‐specific employment and real GDP. The research then considers a potential explanation for why governments continue to subsidise events and facilities, why ex‐ante projections of economic impacts often fail to materialise, and why some ex‐post analyses have found negative realised outcomes. A game theory model is developed in which cities compete to host an event, with a subsidy as part of the hosting arrangement. The final analytical contribution of this research involves the estimation of consumer surplus benefits from a demand model for representative rugby in Wanganui. The consumer surplus benefits are then compared to the cost of local council involvement in the upgrade of the playing facility to evaluate whether the council’s involvement was economically justified. Findings of the research suggest that the economic impact argument for government involvement in the construction of sports facilities and the hosting of internationally oriented events is generally not justified, and that the measurement of benefits are needed to evaluate the desirability of government intervention in such projects.en_US
dc.publisherMassey Universityen_US
dc.rightsThe Authoren_US
dc.subjectWestpac Stadiumen_US
dc.subjectSports facilities constructionen_US
dc.subjectSports event subsidisationen_US
dc.subjectWanganui rugbyen_US
dc.subjectSport and economicsen_US
dc.titleAssessing the economic justification for government involvement in sports facilities and events in New Zealand : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economics at Massey University, Manawatu campus, New Zealanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEconomics
thesis.degree.grantorMassey University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph. D.)


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record