• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The role of the vagal innervation of the stomach (abomasum and pylorus) and intestine (duodenum) in insulin and oxytocin release in sheep : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Science at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    02_whole.pdf (4.935Mb)
    01_front.pdf (1.130Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    Although mechanisms regulating nutrient partitioning and milk synthesis are not fully understood in ruminants, recent studies in lactating monogastric animals have shown that the vagus nerve modulates secretion of various hormones that are implicated in the short- and long-term control of nutrient partitioning. Therefore, the overall aim of this study was to examine the role of the vagal innervation of the GI tract on insulin and oxytocin release and milk yield in sheep. In a series of experiments described in this thesis, the effect of vagotomy was studied in ewes and wethers by comparing the responses of vagotomized animals (i.e. abomasal, pyloric, duodenal and hepatic branches sectioned) with control (sham-operated) animals. Insulin release in response to a bolus injection of glucose was studied in lactating ewes (Chapters 2 and 4) or wethers (Chapters 3 and 5). The differences in responses were not significant in the experiments described in Chapters 3 and 4. However, the release of insulin from the pancreas in response to glucose injection was significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed in the vagotomized animals used in the experiments described in Chapters 2 and 5. Moreover in the experiments with wethers (Chapter 5), insulin secretion in response to glucose bolus injection was significantly (P < 0.05) higher when administered 2 h (i.e. fed state) following feeding than 22 h (i.e. fasting state). In addition, postprandial insulin concentrations were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the vagotomized wethers than in the sham-operated wethers, but insulin secretion in the vagotomized wethers was apparently unaffected by plane of nutrition, despite significantly (P < 0.05) higher blood glucose levels in wethers on the HP intake. The insulin concentrations were, however, higher (P < 0.05) in the control group of wethers fed on the high plane (HP) of nutrition than those fed on the low plane (LP) of nutrition (Chapter 5). Insulin was released in response to the sight and/or ingestion of food, cephalic phase insulin release (CPIR), without any significant changes in blood glucose concentrations. However, the increase in insulin concentration was significantly (P < 0.05) suppressed in both vagotomized wethers and ewes in comparison with control animals (Chapters 5 and 6). Suckling increased plasma insulin concentrations in the sham-operated ewes but not in the vagotomized ewes (Chapter 6), although the difference in the concentrations between the two groups was not statistically significant (P < 0.09). Milk and fat yields were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced for one day and two days, respectively, in the vagotomized ewes compared with those of sham-operated controls, but was restored over the next 2-3 days (Chapter 2). Milk yield was not different between the two treatment groups in the second study (Chapter 4). Suckling-associated plasma oxytocin concentrations were significantly (P < 0.01) lower in the vagotomized ewes than in the sham-operated control ewes, although the difference was not statistically significant when corrected for baseline values (Chapter 4). In the next experiment (Chapter 6), oxytocin concentrations between the two treatment groups of ewes were not significantly different. However, in this experiment, suckling caused a significant (P < 0.05) increase in oxytocin concentrations from the baseline values in the sham-operated ewes fed and suckled simultaneously but not in the vagotomized ewes fed and suckled simultaneously. Vagotomy significantly (P < 0.05) increased digestibility of dry matter and nitrogen in wethers, although food intake was not different between the two treatment groups (Chapter 3). In conclusion, the findings in wethers (Chapter 5) agree with those in lactating ewes (Chapters 2 and 4) and, indicated that the effect of vagotomy on insulin release in response to glucose injection is more apparent over a short period (i.e. 2-4 h; Chapters 2 and 5) following feeding than after a longer period (i.e. 6-22 h; Chapters 4 and 5). This suggested that the pancreatic β-cells are more sensitive soon after feeding, because the vagal inputs reaching the β-cells from the GI tract are higher due to the recent consumption of food. The finding that post-prandial insulin concentrations in the vagotomized animals of HP group were significantly reduced, despite their significantly higher blood glucose levels, provide further evidence that the vagus nerve is a major determinant for sensitizing pancreatic β-cells. Furthermore the vagal innervation of the GI tract plays a major role in CPIR, and also appears to play an important role in insulin release during suckling in sheep. The concentrations of oxytocin measured in these experiments suggest that vagotomy interferes with oxytocin secretion although differences between vagotomized and sham operated ewes were often non significant. However, the data suggest that feeding stimulates OT secretion. It is possible that the failure to achieve consistent differences in milk ejection and hence removal in these studies may have been partly masked because of the anatomical features of the mammary gland of the ewe. Finally the activity of the vagus nerve influences the digestibility of dry matter and nitrogen in sheep.
    Date
    1998
    Author
    Herath, Chandana B.
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/2594
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1