• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Scientific English and Thai students : a study of the comprehensibility of complex structures : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education at Massey University

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    02_whole.pdf (11.45Mb)
    01_front.pdf (893.9Kb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    This study attempted to examine (i) the relationship between Thai science students' comprehension of English complex structures and their reading comprehension of scientific English passages, (ii) the patterns among comprehensibility levels of complex structures for good and pool readers and (iii) the differences in the comprehensibility of complex structures within given types for good and poor readers, taken separately. The sample comprised 190 subjects who were drawn from five different Faculties at Khon Kaen University -- Medicine, Nursing, Science, Agriculture and Education. Four tests were constructed -- two measuring comprehension of scientific English, two measuring comprehension of three types of complex structures, viz., complements, comparatives and relatives. On the basis of cloze reading scores, 40 good readers and 43 poor readers were identified. Their structure comprehension scores were analyzed and compared. The results revealed that comprehension of English complex structures and reading comprehension of scientific English passages were positively related. When comprehensibility levels of complex structures were examined for patterns and when patterns characteristic of good and poor readers were compared, the results revealed a group of structures easy for both groups and another group of structures which tended to be relatively difficult for both groups. Easy structures seemed to share several general features notably the presence of particular types of surface cues in the surface structures, the presence of all surface elements and overt rather than covert ordering of surface elements within clauses. Difficult structures, on the other hand, displayed different types of surface cues or had surface cues absent from the surface structures. Moreover in such difficult structures, not all surface elements were present. It was also found that there were differences in the comprehensibility levels of complex structures within the different types. Again the presence or absence of surface cues seemed to affect sentence comprehensibility. The easier structures within the different types tended to contain the surface elements required to understand the sentence. The position of the relative clause seemed also to have an effect on the comprehensibility level of relative sentences. Right-branching relative clauses seemed to be more comprehensible than centre-embedded relative clauses. Finally the data revealed that good readers comprehended complex structures significantly better than did poor readers in most of the structures investigated. Their comprehension of two complex structures, however, was found not significantly different. They were (i) Non-finite (to-infinitive) object complement and (ii) Comparison of inequality where than is absent. Some explanation of the results was attempted and some educational implications were drawn.
    Date
    1982
    Author
    Chaiyai, Sripanya
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/3133
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1