|dc.description.abstract||This thesis examines the circumstances by which the British became involved in
Greece in 1941. It shows that the British government was influenced by the Prime
Minister, Winston Churchill, and more importantly by his emissary to the Middle East,
the Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden. The government had no clear idea of what they
hoped to achieve beyond the vain hopes of building a coalition in the Balkans against
Axis expansion in that region. This they failed to achieve, and the poorly equipped
and under-manned expedition they despatched had little chance of military success
against a better equipped and organised enemy.
An analysis of the equipment and numbers of the Allied and Axis forces reveals the
handicap suffered by the inadequately supplied Allied troops in Greece had little
chance of holding the well-prepared German forces.
The question of whether the British government deliberately misled the New
Zealand and Australian governments in their quest to use Dominion troops in Greece
is considered and a judgement made.
The performance of one unit of the New Zealand Expeditionary Force, 21 Battalion,
is examined and is found to be wanting, mainly because of poor leadership by its
commanding officer. An examination of this officer's personality and defeatist
attitude reveals how his command affected the battalion's performance. This is
contrasted with the courage and hardiness shown by his men when they were no longer
under his influence during their escape after the action at Pinios Gorge.
Finally, the reporting of the campaign in the New Zealand official histories shows
that these avoided criticism of any deficiencies in the New Zealanders' performance,
and a more recent work which relied heavily on these histories for its information is
similarly flawed in the picture it presents.||en