• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    "Enclosed" and "open" forms in modern English drama : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English at Massey University

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    02_whole.pdf (28.69Mb)
    01_front.pdf (2.915Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    This study examines structural patterns in plays by Pinero, Shaw, O'Casey, Eliot, Arden and Pinter, and proposes that there are, in broad terms, two types of play structure - "enclosed" and "open" - which may be usefully differentiated for this purpose. The first type is characterised by its precise articulation of the action within a regularly-shaped, often symmetrical framework, and the second by its juxtaposition of strands of action or thematically illustrative episodes within a comparatively loose framework. It is contended that a polarity between those types of structure is demonstrable in modern English drama and has been a significant factor in its development. Part One of the study examines Pinero's social dramas and Shaw's disquisitory plays, analysing the contrasting methods of theatrical patterning used by these writers and discussing why they used these methods. Shaw's opposition to the deterministic effect of Pinero's "well-made" structures is emphasised, and his development of a much more fluid technique whereby the play was allowed "to write and shape itself" is considered in some detail. Part Two of the study considers later modifications and developments of the structural approaches exemplified in the plays of Pinero and Shaw. In the first chapter of Part Two, plays by O'Casey and Arden are analysed to show how these writers have used "open" structure techniques, comparable to those of Shaw, to express broadly similar points of view. In the other chapter to Part Two, plays by Eliot and Pinter are analysed to show the contribution of these writers to the development of a new type of "enclosed" play, as precisely articulated as Pinero's but without the explicit causality of the "well-made" play. It is suggested that this type of structure, while basically "enclosed" in character, represents a partial synthesis of "open" and "enclosed" form.
    Date
    1974
    Author
    Dawick, John Dearnley
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/4554
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2023.7-7
     

     

    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2023.7-7