Improving early nutritional intervention in hospitalised patients : laboratory test (prealbumin) versus routine clinical assessment : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science, Nutrition and Dietetics at Massey University, Albany, Auckland, New Zealand
Loading...
Date
2013
DOI
Open Access Location
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Massey University
Rights
The Author
Abstract
Malnutrition in hospitalised patients occurs in 30% of Australasian Hospitals.
There are an estimated fifty malnutrition-screening tools currently available,
although no single screening tool is universally accepted as gold standard in all
settings. The Waitemata District Health Board (WDHB) hospitals: North Shore
hospital (NSH) and Waitakere hospital utilise the Malnutrition Universal
Screening Tool (MUST). A hospital dietitian audit performed in 2009 at NSH
identified as few as 8% of patients were screened using MUST. Universal
screening on hospital admission incorporating prealbumin has been proposed
as a more effective method for early identification of patients at risk of diseaserelated
malnutrition.
Aims
To evaluate whether universal prealbumin screening increases the number of
patients identified and referred to a dietitian for comprehensive disease-related
malnutrition assessment.
Method
A two-phase observational cohort study was conducted utilising consecutively
admitted patients to: two acute surgical, one acute orthopaedic and two acute
medical wards from February to April 2013. Phase I: Observational stage
recorded dietetic inpatient referral data for patients screened by MUST
triggering a dietetic referral. Phase II: Research protocol, patients were selected
using electronic notes programme ConcertoTM. Patients that met the research
inclusion criteria had admission blood samples tested for prealbumin and Creactive
protein (CRP) within 36 hours post admission. The researcher
examined whether abnormal prealbumin level <0.2 g/L triggered a prompt
referral to a dietetic assessment. Dietetic inpatient referral data set was
repeated for phase II as in phase I.
Results
Phase I, 970 patients were admitted during a 25-day control period. Patient
referral pathway was either through MUST or clinical professional referral with
28% of patients having a completed MUST in their clinical notes, a total of 7.8%
(76/970) of patients were referred.
Phase II, 776 patients were admitted during a 22-day period, 564 patients met
inclusion criteria and were selected for screening. Test results indicated 27%
(155/564) had abnormal prealbumin results ranged from 0.03 g/L to 0.54 g/L;
these patients deemed at risk of malnutrition. A total of 43 patients were
referred to a dietitian through either MUST or clinical professional referral. 30%
of those 43 patients assessed by a dietitian had abnormal prealbumin results,
although 70% of those did not initiate a dietetic referral. Of 43 patients referred
51% had a completed MUST screen recorded; however nil patients referrals
were triggered by abnormal prealbumin results.
Conclusion
In our study prealbumin results were found to be a sensitive marker of
malnutrition risk with 27% of screened patients deemed at risk of malnutrition.
This is in-line with international prevalence rates of hospital malnutrition set
between 20-60%. However, despite ours findings it was identified that the
clinicians poorly recognise hospital malnutrition, as patients were not referred
based on abnormal pre-albumin levels.
Description
Keywords
Malnutrition in hospitals, Hospital patient nutrition, Prealbumin, Malnutrition screening, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Malnutrition screening tool