Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcIvor, Jessica Anne
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-19T20:08:30Z
dc.date.available2015-02-19T20:08:30Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/6246
dc.description.abstractFor some chronically ill children, having an injection is a regular occurrence and can result in distress and avoidance behaviour for the child and their family. There can also be negative health implications of these children not having their injections. Research supports the effectiveness of various cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) packages for childhood needle-related distress (NRD), although which components are most effective has yet to be identified. The aim of the present study was to replicate previous research findings from McIvor (2011), by dismantling an existing manualised CBT package to determine whether cognitive and/or behavioural components were necessary for a reduction in NRD. Three treatment manuals were used to conduct this research, namely (1) a CBT manual (6 sessions), (2) a cognitive therapy (CT, 4 sessions) manual, and (3) a behavioural therapy (BT, 4 sessions) manual. Treatments were evaluated using a multiple-baseline across participants single-case design. Twelve children aged 7-13 of New Zealand European/Pakeha and Maori descent were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment conditions, with four children and their carers assigned to each condition. Case study and group analysis indicated that six sessions of CBT was more effective than four sessions of CT or four sessions of BT based on the magnitude of change displayed in relation to NRD symptoms and the number of promising single-case replications. However, when assessing individual case results in certain areas (e.g., coping and cognitions related to injections), CT and BT were just as effective as CBT for some children. Both children and carers expressed high levels of satisfaction with the three treatments and all children successfully received an injection. Treatment was also characterised by particularly low dropout rates with all 12 participants attending the required assessments and therapy sessions. Finally implications of this study are discussed including the outcome that exposure tasks tend to produce the most change. However, techniques essential for the development of common factors (e.g., therapeutic rapport) should not be eliminated without further research, as these processes may need to be established in order for the client to attempt exposure tasks in the first place.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMassey Universityen_US
dc.rightsThe Authoren_US
dc.subjectFear of needlesen_US
dc.subjectCognitive therapy for childrenen_US
dc.subjectCognitive-behavioural therapyen_US
dc.subjectChronically ill childrenen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Social sciences::Psychology::Applied psychologyen_US
dc.title"Stupid little pointy needle!" : dismantling a cognitive-behavioural treatment for chronically ill children with needle-related distress : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Clinical Psychology at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineClinical Psychologyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorMassey Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Clinical Psychology (D.Clin.Psych.)en_US


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record