Resilence planning for natural hazards in New Zealand : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Resource and Environmental Planning at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Loading...
Date
2015
DOI
Open Access Location
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Massey University
Rights
The Author
Abstract
We live in times with a heightened sense of uncertainty and constant reminders of the risk of
extreme natural hazard events, as evidenced by the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake series.
Resilience planning is rapidly gaining salience as a promising approach for dealing with the
complex challenge of uncertainty and escalating natural hazard risk. Yet, it is not clear what
resilience planning means, beyond the assumption that it is good to be resilient and that we
should plan to build resilience in practice. Despite the lack of clarity, there is a growing number
of scholars exploring the approach, its potential and benefits. It is, however, in its conceptual
stage and has yet to be widely adopted in planning practice, in New Zealand or elsewhere.
This begs the question that this thesis aims to explore: What are the barriers and opportunities
for effectively institutionalising resilience planning and how can it be operationalised in planning
practice in New Zealand? This question is explored through a case study analysis of
experiences in the Waimakariri District in Canterbury after the 2010-2011 earthquake events.
The key findings of this research show there are nine barriers to institutionalising resilience
planning (community priorities; cost versus benefit; high vulnerability; knowledge; leadership;
responsibilities; time/timing; the legislative setting; and silos). The research revealed that each
of these barriers will challenge resilience planning and its institutionalisation at different stages
of the planning process. The barriers must first be overcome to allow for the operationalisation
of the resilience planning characteristics through actions for practice. Opportunities for
institutionalising resilience planning so as to overcome the barriers and allow it to become a
reality in practice were explored. The opportunities included, for example, the following: the
earthquake experiences; heightened awareness and interest in resilience planning; the recovery
and rebuild period; relationships and connections made; ensuring a concerted effort and focus
on resilience planning; undertaking vulnerability assessment; and placing focus on the culture of
resilience planning. Six resilience planning characteristics required for operationalisation in
practice were identified (leadership; social capital; social learning; community; reflection; and
innovation). Based on these findings, a framework is proposed to institutionalise and
operationalise resilience planning in New Zealand. The application of this framework will assist
in shaping current thinking and planning practice and enable choices that will ultimately build
more resilient, sustainable communities in the face of uncertainty and escalating natural hazard
risks.
Description
Keywords
Natural hazards, Resilience planning, Emergency management, New Zealand, Risk assessment