Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoleyn, Teresa Deirdre
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-23T02:44:50Z
dc.date.available2015-10-23T02:44:50Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/7251
dc.description.abstractDuring the late seventeenth- and early eighteenth-centuries debates about issues of gender and sexual behaviour became prominent in literary discourse. These gender debates were informed by traditions of western literature such as the classical Greeks and Romans and the Bible. In two of these debates we can see the adaptations of misogynist writings to support claims of male superiority, expressions of male desire and women's inherently evil and depraved natures. In contrast, the women reassess the traditions to make room for female equality, expression and expectations. In the work of Robert Gould, Sarah Egerton, John Sprint, "Eugenia" and Lady Mary Chudleigh, we see a crystallisation of arguments in gender debates. Each writer describes their expectations of men's and women's behaviour and voices assumptions about the sexes based on current ideologies. In the works of the women writers we can trace the development of early English feminism.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMassey Universityen_US
dc.rightsThe Authoren_US
dc.subjectSex role,18th centuryen_US
dc.subjectWomen, Englanden_US
dc.subjectSexual ethics, 18th centuryen_US
dc.subjectGender debatesen_US
dc.subjectEarly English feminismen_US
dc.titleGender debates in literature 1683-1701 : the Gould-Egerton and Sprint-Eugenia-Chudleigh controversies : a thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English at Massey Universityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEnglishen_US
thesis.degree.grantorMassey Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts (M.A.)en_US


Files in this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record