• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analysing gecko monitoring data and standardising monitoring procedures at Shakespear, Tawharanui and Whakanewha Regional Parks : a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Management, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    01_front.pdf (96.31Kb)
    02_whole.pdf (1.056Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    Constant inventories of New Zealand gecko populations are important to monitor the status of the populations over time and allow diagnosis of declines in abundance. Long-term monitoring can also provide information on how effective different management schemes are for conserving a species. Populations of Pacific geckos (Dactylocnemis pacificus) are monitored at Shakespear and Whakanewha, and populations of forest (Mokopirirakau granulatus) and green geckos (Naultinus elegans) are monitored at Tawharanui and Whakanewha on a yearly basis. Whakanewha has a poison based regime for controlling predators, and Tawharanui and Shakespear are largely reliant on predator-proof fences. Visual encounter surveys (VESs) provide a relative abundance estimate of the gecko populations in terms of catch per unit effort (CPUE). There was no significant change in CPUE over the three years of monitoring (2012-2014) for any of the gecko populations. It is a possibility this could be a result of small statistical power tests. Comparisons of abundance indices could not be made between parks due to the likely difference of detectability in different vegetation types. Despite the change in activity levels of some animal species during different phases of the moon, this study found that the same phenomenon does not occur for green and forest geckos. There was no significant difference in the CPUE of the gecko species from VESs conducted during the new and full moon. Therefore, there is no need to stratify VESs based on the moon phases in order to account for changes in the activity levels of the geckos when obtaining abundance indices. Tracking tunnels have proven an effective monitoring device for estimating the distribution and relative abundance of animal species and have increasingly been used to monitor lizard species. Its use for detecting arboreal geckos has not been completed with any great success. One Pacific gecko was detected in this study using tracking tunnels designed for arboreal geckos, a very low tracking rate. Cell foam retreats (CFRs) were also used for detecting geckos. They were able to detect the presence of all gecko species at the three parks that were detected by VESs except for one instance: CFRs failed to detect the presence of green geckos at Whakanewha. Therefore, it is advisable that they are not used exclusively for monitoring the gecko populations.
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Chamberlain, Elizabeth
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/7445
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1