• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The effectiveness of New Zealand marine reserve advisory committees as a participatory mechanism : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Resource and Environment Planning at Massey University

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    01_front.pdf (870.3Kb)
    02_whole.pdf (37.51Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    Knowledge about participatory management practices in marine protection is deficient; despite this, participatory approaches are being used with increasing frequency. In New Zealand, marine reserve advisory committees (MRCs) are a means to facilitate public involvement in marine management. The aim of this study is to determine if MRCs are an effective participatory mechanism. Four case study MRCs are examined: Kapiti, Te Whanganui-A-Hei, Long Island-Kokomohua and Te Tapuwae o Rongokako. Data collection techniques include Department of Conservation (DOC) staff interviews, a MRC member survey and document analysis. The case study MRCs consist of eight or nine members, and include tangata whenua and interest groups. Membership is not representative of the inactive public. Comparing MRCs to theory indicates the committees are classic examples of elite advisory groups. Not all DOC staff and committee members have the same understanding of MRC roles or the benefits members receive from participation. Specific MRC roles vary, but can include advising DOC, creating public awareness initiatives and fostering community support. Absenteeism, DOC and Conservation Board support, funding, terms of reference and meeting frequency influence MRC effectiveness. The majority of DOC interviewees and MRC survey respondents are satisfied with the current system; however, MRC respondents desire more funding and resources. Only one case study MRC has a strong majority of respondents who want to augment their responsibilities and decision-making power. To increase the ability of MRCs to act, a framework of different levels of advisory committees is suggested. Means to improve the current MRC system include: networking between marine reserves; clarifying terminology used (e.g. participation and partnership); greater use of perceptual and traditional knowledge; a transparent process; tangible results; and providing MRC members with incentives and clear feedback. Building on other research, this thesis enhances the understanding of interactions between MRCs and DOC, and provides guidance that may be useful to build on current efforts to engage the local community in marine conservation. Though specific to New Zealand, the results are useful to planners and managers in other nations because effective participation and community support are key to the success of protected areas.
    Date
    2002
    Author
    Uunila, Laani Kirsten
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/8557
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1