Locked Out: Generational inequalities of housing tenure and housing type
| dc.citation.issue | 4 | |
| dc.citation.volume | 40 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lowies B | |
| dc.contributor.author | Squires G | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rossini P | |
| dc.contributor.author | McGreal S | |
| dc.date.available | 12/07/2022 | |
| dc.date.issued | 12/07/2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to first explore whether Australia and the main metropolitan areas demonstrate significant differences in tenure and property type between generational groups. Second, whether the millennial generation is more likely to rent rather than own. Third, if such variation in tenure and property type by millennials is one of individual choice and lifestyle or the impact of housing market inefficiencies. Design/methodology/approach: This paper employs a comparative research approach using secondary data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) to consider housing tenure and type distributions across generations as well as through cross-city analysis. Findings: The results show that home ownership is still the dominant tenure in Australia, but private rental is of increasing significance, becoming the tenure of choice for Millennials. Owner occupation is shown to remain and high and stable levels for older generations and while lower in percentage terms for Generation X; this generation exhibits the highest growth rate for ownership. Significant differences are shown in tenure patterns across Australia. Originality/value: The significance of this paper is the focus on the analysis of generational differences in housing tenure and type, initially for Australia and subsequently by major metropolitan areas over three inter-census periods (2006, 2011 and 2016). It enhances the understanding of how policies favouring ageing in place can contradict other policies on housing affordability with specific impact on Millennials as different generations are respectively unequally locked-out and locked-in to housing wealth. | |
| dc.description.confidential | FALSE | |
| dc.format.extent | 510 - 526 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Property Management, 2022, 40 (4), pp. 510 - 526 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/PM-09-2021-0067 | |
| dc.identifier.elements-id | 449957 | |
| dc.identifier.harvested | Massey_Dark | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0263-7472 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10179/16822 | |
| dc.publisher | Emerald | |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Property Management | |
| dc.subject.anzsrc | 12 Built Environment and Design | |
| dc.subject.anzsrc | 15 Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services | |
| dc.title | Locked Out: Generational inequalities of housing tenure and housing type | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.notes | Not known | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University/Massey Business School | |
| pubs.organisational-group | /Massey University/Massey Business School/School of Economics and Finance |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1