Predictors of voter support for the legalization of recreational cannabis use and supply via a national referendum

dc.citation.volume99
dc.contributor.authorWilkins C
dc.contributor.authorTremewan J
dc.contributor.authorRychert M
dc.contributor.authorAtkinson Q
dc.contributor.authorFischer K
dc.contributor.authorForsyth GAL
dc.coverage.spatialNetherlands
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T02:22:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-04T01:41:53Z
dc.date.available2021-09-21
dc.date.available2023-08-30T02:22:00Z
dc.date.available2023-09-04T01:41:53Z
dc.date.issued2022-01
dc.date.updated2023-08-24T21:46:15Z
dc.description© 2021 The Authorsen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground A national referendum to legalise recreational cannabis use and supply in New Zealand via the Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill (CLCB) was recently narrowly defeated. Understanding the underlying factors for this result can inform the cannabis legalisation debate in other countries. Aims To investigate predictors of voter support for and opposition to the CLCB. Method A representative population panel of 1,022 people completed an online survey of intended voting on the CLCB referendum, which included questions on demographics, drug use history, medicinal cannabis, perceptions of the health risk and moral views of cannabis use, political affiliation, religiosity, community size and reading of the CLCB. Regression models were developed to predict support for the CLCB, with additional predictor variables added over successive iterations. Results The most robust predictors of support for the CLCB were use of and policy support for medicinal cannabis use, voting for a left-wing political party, having a positive moral view of cannabis use, living in a small town and having read the CLCB. Predictors of opposing the CLCB were voting for right-wing parties, considering “frequent” cannabis use to be a high health risk, and lifetime use of other drugs. Age, ethnicity, education, employment status, religiosity and lifetime cannabis use were not significant predictors after controlling for other variables. Conclusions Support for cannabis legalization was not based on broad demographics, but rather specific views concerning the medicinal benefit, morality of cannabis use, health risk of frequent cannabis use, political party affiliation, and knowledge of the proposed regulatory controls of the CLCB. The influence of moral views of cannabis use on voting behaviour suggest the need to debate the right to use cannabis. The importance of knowledge of the proposed regulatory controls of the CLCB on voting underlines the need to raise awareness of proposed regulatory controls during debate.
dc.format.extent103442-
dc.identifierARTN 103442
dc.identifierS0955-3959(21)00347-9
dc.identifierhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34560621
dc.identifier.citationWilkins C, Tremewan J, Rychert M, Atkinson Q, Fischer K, Forsyth GAL. (2022). Predictors of voter support for the legalization of recreational cannabis use and supply via a national referendum.. Int J Drug Policy. 99. (pp. 103442-).
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103442
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4758
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.harvestedMassey_Dark
dc.identifier.issn0955-3959
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/20031
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V
dc.relation.isPartOfInt J Drug Policy
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectCannabis legalization
dc.subjectCannabis referendum
dc.subjectMedicinal cannabis
dc.subjectMorality of cannabis use
dc.subjectNew Zealand
dc.subjectCannabis
dc.subjectHallucinogens
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLegislation, Drug
dc.subjectMedical Marijuana
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.titlePredictors of voter support for the legalization of recreational cannabis use and supply via a national referendum
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id448681
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
448681.pdf
Size:
471.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Collections