Dental Ageing Offers New Insights Into the First Epigenetic Clock for Common Dolphins (Delphinus delphis)

dc.citation.issue11
dc.citation.volume15
dc.contributor.authorHanninger E-MF
dc.contributor.authorPeters KJ
dc.contributor.authorGerber L
dc.contributor.authorBarratclough A
dc.contributor.authorBetty EL
dc.contributor.authorPalmer EI
dc.contributor.authorHorvath S
dc.contributor.authorStockin KA
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-04T20:31:05Z
dc.date.issued2025-11
dc.description.abstractDetermining exact age in wild odontocetes is essential for understanding population dynamics, survival, and reproduction, yet remains logistically challenging. Although epigenetic ageing is emerging as a valuable approach, only nine species-specific clocks currently exist. Most have been calibrated using known-age animals in human care or well-studied wild populations. Only three previous studies have used dental ages from stranded or bycaught individuals. This is due to concerns that dental age inaccuracies, especially in older animals, may affect epigenetic clock performance. To explore this, we developed the first species-specific epigenetic clock for common dolphins (Delphinus delphis), analysing DNA methylation at 37,492 cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites in skin samples from stranded and bycaught dolphins with estimated dental ages. Elastic net models with Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation were applied to three subsets: the ‘relaxed’ subset (all individuals; n = 75, median absolute error (MAE) = 2.02, r = 0.81, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.66), the ‘strict’ subset (excluding individuals with minimum dental age estimates only; n = 73, MAE = 2.29, r = 0.81, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.66), and the ‘restricted’ subset (excluding outliers with prediction errors > 6 years; n = 63, MAE = 1.80, r = 0.91, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82) to compare performance. Our models consistently underestimated the age of dolphins > 16 years, even when minimum dental ages were applied, suggesting that absolute errors between dental and epigenetic estimates are unlikely to reflect the dental ageing error. Additionally, post-mortem decomposition condition code (DCC 1 to 3) did not affect age prediction, signalling promise for future epigenetic clocks calibrated with strandings and bycaught individuals.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.edition.editionNovember 2025
dc.identifier.author-urlhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-3983
dc.identifier.citationHanninger EMF, Peters KJ, Gerber L, Barratclough A, Betty EL, Palmer EI, Horvath S, Stockin KA. (2025). Dental Ageing Offers New Insights Into the First Epigenetic Clock for Common Dolphins (Delphinus delphis). Ecology and Evolution. 15. 11.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.72424
dc.identifier.eissn2045-7758
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn2045-7758
dc.identifier.numbere72424
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/73910
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBritish Ecological Society, and John Wiley and Sons Limited
dc.publisher.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.72424
dc.relation.isPartOfEcology and Evolution
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights(c) 2025 The Author/s
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectage biomarkers
dc.subjectchronological age estimation
dc.subjectDNA methylation
dc.subjectlife-history
dc.subjecttooth ageing
dc.titleDental Ageing Offers New Insights Into the First Epigenetic Clock for Common Dolphins (Delphinus delphis)
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id608251
pubs.organisational-groupOther

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
608251 PDF.pdf
Size:
540.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Evidence

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections