When and how to say goodbye: An analysis of Standard Operating Procedures that guide end-of-life decision-making for stranded cetaceans in Australasia

Simple item page
dc.citation.volume138
dc.contributor.authorBoys RM
dc.contributor.authorBeausoleil NJ
dc.contributor.authorBetty EL
dc.contributor.authorStockin KA
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T02:13:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T06:45:35Z
dc.date.available2022-02-18
dc.date.available2024-01-19T02:13:17Z
dc.date.available2024-07-25T06:45:35Z
dc.date.issued2022-04
dc.description.abstractStandard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are tools used to ensure management best practice during emergency incidents including wildlife interventions, such as cetacean strandings. The compromised state of stranded cetaceans means humane end-of-life decisions may be considered, and SOPs frequently guide this process. This study evaluated SOPs for end-of-life decision-making and technically enacting euthanasia of stranded cetaceans across Australasia. The aim was to highlight similarities and differences in management and explore directions to improve stranded cetacean welfare. SOPs were requested from the eight government authorities across Australia and New Zealand. All SOPs were evaluated for decision-making criteria, yielding 29 parameters for the implementation of end-of-life decisions. Euthanasia and palliative care were options for end-of-life, with palliative care recommended when euthanasia was not feasible or presented human safety risks. Three euthanasia methods were recommended. Ballistics was recommended in seven SOPs, chemicals in five and explosives in three SOPs. Variability existed in the exact procedures and equipment recommended in all three methods. Additionally, only five SOPs provided criteria for verifying death, while only two recommended time-to-death be recorded, hindering evaluation of the welfare impacts of end-of-life decisions and euthanasia procedures. Our findings highlight the need for detailed guidance and consistency in end-of-life decisions and euthanasia techniques to ensure reliable welfare outcomes. Systematic, standardised data collection at euthanasia events across regions is required to facilitate assessment of welfare impacts and develop evidence-based recommendations. International collaboration is key to developing objective criteria necessary to ensure consistent guidance for end-of-life decisions.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.edition.editionApril 2022
dc.identifier.citationBoys RM, Beausoleil NJ, Betty EL, Stockin KA. (2022). When and how to say goodbye: An analysis of Standard Operating Procedures that guide end-of-life decision-making for stranded cetaceans in Australasia. Marine Policy. 138.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104949
dc.identifier.eissn1872-9460
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn0308-597X
dc.identifier.number104949
dc.identifier.piiS0308597X21005601
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/70810
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X21005601
dc.relation.isPartOfMarine Policy
dc.rights(c) 2022 The Author/s
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectWelfare
dc.subjectDeath
dc.subjectEuthanasia
dc.subjectMarine mammal
dc.subjectStrandings
dc.subjectManagement
dc.titleWhen and how to say goodbye: An analysis of Standard Operating Procedures that guide end-of-life decision-making for stranded cetaceans in Australasia
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id451272
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Published version
Size:
1.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Evidence
Size:
329.98 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles