Power source, data retrieval method, and attachment type affect success of dorsally mounted tracking tag deployments in 37 species of shorebirds

dc.citation.issue6
dc.citation.volume2025
dc.contributor.authorWeiser EL
dc.contributor.authorLanctot RB
dc.contributor.authorRuthrauff DR
dc.contributor.authorSaalfeld ST
dc.contributor.authorTibbitts TL
dc.contributor.authorAbad-Gómez JM
dc.contributor.authorAldabe J
dc.contributor.authorde Almeida JB
dc.contributor.authorAlves JA
dc.contributor.authorAnderson GQA
dc.contributor.authorBattley PF
dc.contributor.authorBelting H
dc.contributor.authorBêty J
dc.contributor.authorBianchini K
dc.contributor.authorBishop MA
dc.contributor.authorBom RA
dc.contributor.authorBowgen K
dc.contributor.authorBrown GS
dc.contributor.authorBrown SC
dc.contributor.authorBugoni L
dc.contributor.authorBurton NHK
dc.contributor.authorBybee DR
dc.contributor.authorCarneiro C
dc.contributor.authorCastresana G
dc.contributor.authorChan Y-C
dc.contributor.authorChoi C-Y
dc.contributor.authorChristie KS
dc.contributor.authorClark NA
dc.contributor.authorConklin JR
dc.contributor.authorCruz-López M
dc.contributor.authorDinsmore SJ
dc.contributor.authorDodd SG
dc.contributor.authorDouglas DC
dc.contributor.authorEberhart-Hertel LJ
dc.contributor.authorEnglish WB
dc.contributor.authorEwing HT
dc.contributor.authorFaria FA
dc.contributor.authorFranks SE
dc.contributor.authorFuller RA
dc.contributor.authorGill RE
dc.contributor.authorGiroux M-A
dc.contributor.authorGratto-Trevor CL
dc.contributor.authorGreen DJ
dc.contributor.authorGreen RE
dc.contributor.authorGreen RMW
dc.contributor.authorGunnarsson TG
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez JS
dc.contributor.authorHarrison A-L
dc.contributor.authorHartman CA
dc.contributor.authorHassell CJ
dc.contributor.authorHoepfner SA
dc.contributor.authorHooijmeijer JCEW
dc.contributor.authorJohnson JA
dc.contributor.authorJohnson OW
dc.contributor.authorKempenaers B
dc.contributor.authorKlaassen M
dc.contributor.authorKok EMA
dc.contributor.authorKrietsch J
dc.contributor.authorKüpper C
dc.contributor.authorKwarteng AY
dc.contributor.authorKwon E
dc.contributor.authorLamarre J-F
dc.contributor.authorLatty CJ
dc.contributor.authorLecomte N
dc.contributor.authorLoonstra AHJ
dc.contributor.authorMa Z
dc.contributor.authorMander L
dc.contributor.authorMarlow C
dc.contributor.authorMarra PP
dc.contributor.authorMasero JA
dc.contributor.authorMcDuffie LA
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire RL
dc.contributor.authorMelter J
dc.contributor.authorMelville DS
dc.contributor.authorMéndez V
dc.contributor.authorMichels TJ
dc.contributor.authorMorrissey CA
dc.contributor.authorMu T
dc.contributor.authorNewstead DJ
dc.contributor.authorPage GW
dc.contributor.authorPierce AK
dc.contributor.authorPiersma T
dc.contributor.authorRepenning M
dc.contributor.authorRobinson BH
dc.contributor.authorRocha AD
dc.contributor.authorRogers DI
dc.contributor.authorScarpignato AL
dc.contributor.authorSchulte S
dc.contributor.authorScragg ES
dc.contributor.authorSenner NR
dc.contributor.authorSmith PA
dc.contributor.authorTaylor AR
dc.contributor.authorTaylor RC
dc.contributor.authorÞórisson B
dc.contributor.authorValcu M
dc.contributor.authorVerhoeven MA
dc.contributor.authorWare L
dc.contributor.authorWarnock N
dc.contributor.authorWeber MF
dc.contributor.authorWright LJ
dc.contributor.authorWunder MB
dc.contributor.editorShamoun-Baranes J
dc.contributor.editorBensch S
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-07T19:00:19Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-04
dc.description.abstractAnimal-borne trackers are commonly used to study bird movements, including in long-distance migrants such as shorebirds. Selecting a tracker and attachment method can be daunting, and methodological advancements often have been made by trial and error and conveyed by word of mouth. We synthesized tracking outcomes across 2745 dorsally mounted trackers on 37 shorebird species around the world. We evaluated how attachment method, power source, data retrieval method, relative tracker mass, and biological traits affected success, where success was defined as whether or not each tag deployment reached its expected tracking duration (i.e. all aspects succeeded for the intended duration of the study: attachment, tracking, data acquisition, and bird survival). We conducted separate analyses for tag deployments with remote data retrieval (‘remote-upload tag deployments') and those that archived data and had to be recovered (‘archival tag deployments'). Among remote-upload tag deployments, those that were a lighter mass relative to the bird, were beyond their first year of production, transmitted data via satellite, or were attached with a leg-loop harness were most often successful at reaching their expected tracking duration. Archival tag deployments were most successful when applied at breeding areas, or when applied to males in any season. Remote-upload tag deployments with solar power, satellite data retrieval, or leg-loop harnesses continued tracking for longer than those with battery power, other types of data retrieval, or glue attachments. However, the majority of tag deployments failed to reach their expected tracking duration (71% of remote-upload, 83% of archival), which could have been due to tracker failure, attachment failure, or bird mortality. Our findings highlight that many tag deployments may fail to meet the goals of a study if tracking duration is crucial. Using our results, we provide guidelines for selecting a tracker and attachment to improve success at meeting study goals.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.edition.editionNovember 2025
dc.identifier.citationWeiser EL, Lanctot RB, Ruthrauff DR, Saalfeld ST, Tibbitts TL, Abad-Gómez JM, Aldabe J, Almeida JBD, Alves JA, Anderson GQA, Battley PF, Belting H, Bêty J, Bianchini K, Bishop MA, Bom RA, Bowgen K, Brown GS, Brown SC, Bugoni L, Burton NHK, Bybee DR, Carneiro C, Castresana G, Chan YC, Choi CY, Christie KS, Clark NA, Conklin JR, Cruz-López M, Dinsmore SJ, Dodd SG, Douglas DC, Eberhart-Hertel LJ, English WB, Ewing HT, Faria FA, Franks SE, Fuller RA, Gill RE, Giroux MA, Gratto-Trevor CL, Green DJ, Green RE, Green RMW, Gunnarsson TG, Gutiérrez JS, Harrison AL, Hartman CA, Hassell CJ, Hoepfner SA, Hooijmeijer JCEW, Johnson JA, Johnson OW, Kempenaers B, Klaassen M, Kok EMA, Krietsch J, Küpper C, Kwarteng AY, Kwon E, Lamarre JF, Latty CJ, Lecomte N, Loonstra AHJ, Ma Z, Mander L, Marlow C, Marra PP, Masero JA, McDuffie LA, McGuire RL, Melter J, Melville DS, Méndez V, Michels TJ, Morrissey CA, Mu T, Newstead DJ, Page GW, Pierce AK, Piersma T, Repenning M, Robinson BH, Rocha AD, Rogers DI, Scarpignato AL, Schulte S, Scragg ES, Senner NR, Smith PA, Taylor AR, Taylor RC, Þórisson B, Valcu M, Verhoeven MA, Ware L, Warnock N, Weber MF, Wright LJ. (2025). Power source, data retrieval method, and attachment type affect success of dorsally mounted tracking tag deployments in 37 species of shorebirds. Journal of Avian Biology. 2025. 6.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jav.03487
dc.identifier.eissn1600-048X
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn0908-8857
dc.identifier.numbere03487
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/73993
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos
dc.publisher.urihttps://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jav.03487
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Avian Biology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights(c) 2025 The Author/s
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCharadriiformes
dc.subjectmovement ecology
dc.subjectsatellite tracking
dc.subjecttracking tags
dc.subjectwaders
dc.titlePower source, data retrieval method, and attachment type affect success of dorsally mounted tracking tag deployments in 37 species of shorebirds
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id608893
pubs.organisational-groupOther

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
608893 PDF.pdf
Size:
1.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Evidence

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections