Testing practices for testing times: Exploring Indigenous-led governance

Simple item page
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume13
dc.contributor.authorDionisio R
dc.contributor.authorDombroski K
dc.contributor.authorYates A
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-14T23:38:19Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T06:52:28Z
dc.date.available2024-04-14T23:38:19Z
dc.date.available2024-07-25T06:52:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-12
dc.description.abstractIn this author response, we further reflect on pluriversal and prefigurative approaches to research, centred on Indigenous Māori knowledge, while opening space for cross-cultural perspectives and co-creation methods. We address the responses authored by Meg Parsons, Wendy Steele and Wendy Harcourt, starting by summarising what we took from each contribution. We discuss key questions raised by each of the authors in the context of the evolving research programme and broader developments on wellbeing governance in Aotearoa. Pluriversal and prefigurative experimental approaches are key to testing and iteratively advancing the research agenda in disruptive times.
dc.format.pagination301-305
dc.identifier.citationDionisio R, Dombroski K, Yates A. (2023). Testing practices for testing times: Exploring Indigenous-led governance. Dialogues in Human Geography. 13. 2. (pp. 301-305).
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/20438206231177079
dc.identifier.eissn2043-8214
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn2043-8206
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/71083
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.isPartOfDialogues in Human Geography
dc.relation.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/20438206231177079
dc.titleTesting practices for testing times: Exploring Indigenous-led governance
dc.typeJournal article
massey.relation.uri-descriptionPublished version
pubs.elements-id479158
pubs.organisational-groupCollege of Humanities and Social Sciences
Files
Collections
Journal Articles