Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa
| dc.citation.issue | 3 | |
| dc.citation.volume | 2 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zakharovskyi V | |
| dc.contributor.author | Németh K | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Salvati L | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-03T19:05:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-03T19:05:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-08-10 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Spatial scale in modeling is one of the most important aspects of any kind of assessment. This study utilized previously studied assessments of geodiversity through a qualitative–quantitative methodology for geosite recognition. Our methodology was developed based on geodiversity as a complex description of all elements of abiotic nature and processes, influencing it. Based on this definition, geodiversity can be divided into main elements: geology and geomorphology, creating a core of abiotic nature; and additional elements including hydrology, climate, and human influences. We include this description of geodiversity here to emphasize the data which were used in the assessment. The methodology was based on an evaluation system, subject to improvements informed by previous research, and map-based models showing the area of spreading of calculated elements. Except for additional changes in the assessment, this article primarily addresses the problem of scale, by comparing two different methods of scale in the research: grid and non-grid. Grid types of assessment are considered a widely useable method, requiring definitions of areas of research with a potential variety of polygons, and calculating elements inside the cell and applying values to each cell. In contrast, non-grid assessment utilizes the natural borders of all elements (e.g., map view pattern of geological formations), and including them in calculations. The union of layers from different elements creates shapes which highlight regions with the highest values. Hence, the goal of this article is to demonstrate differences between grid and non-grid assessments of geodiversity in Western Samoa. In our results, we compare the methods and emphasize specific tasks most suitable for each method. | |
| dc.description.confidential | false | |
| dc.edition.edition | September 2022 | |
| dc.format.pagination | 476-490 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Zakharovskyi V, Németh K. (2022). Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa. Geographies. 2. 3. (pp. 476-490). | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/geographies2030029 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2673-7086 | |
| dc.identifier.elements-type | journal-article | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/72163 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) | |
| dc.publisher.uri | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/2/3/29 | |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Geographies | |
| dc.rights | (c) The author/s | en |
| dc.rights.license | CC BY | en |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | rectangular grid | |
| dc.subject | Cenozoic volcanism | |
| dc.subject | geoheritage | |
| dc.subject | geoconservation | |
| dc.subject | geotourism | |
| dc.title | Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.elements-id | 492451 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | College of Health |