The efficacy of electrical stunning of New Zealand rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) and freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus) using the Crustastun™
| dc.citation.volume | 32 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kells NJ | |
| dc.contributor.author | Perrott M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Johnson C | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | England | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T22:42:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-15T22:42:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-09-22 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Large numbers of decapod crustacea are farmed and harvested globally for human consumption. Growing evidence for the capacity of these animals to feel pain, and therefore to suffer, has led to increased concern for their welfare, including at slaughter. In New Zealand, decapod crustacea are protected by animal welfare legislation. There is a requirement that all farmed or commercially caught animals of these species killed for commercial purposes are first rendered insensible. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Crustastun™, a commercially available bench-top electrical stunner, in two commercially important New Zealand crustacean species; the rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) and kōura (freshwater crayfish [Paranephrops zealandicus]). Animals were anaesthetised via intramuscular injection of lidocaine and instrumented to record the electrical activity of the nervous system, prior to being stunned according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Stunning efficacy was determined by analysing neural activity and observing behaviour post stunning. All ten P. zealandicus and three J. edwardsii appeared to be killed outright by the stun. Of the remaining J. edwardsii, six exhibited some degree of muscle tone and/or slow unco-ordinated movements of the limbs or mouthparts after stunning, although there was no recovery of spontaneous or evoked movements. One J. edwardsii was unable to be stunned successfully, likely due to its very large size (1.76 kg). None of the successfully stunned animals showed any evidence of return of awareness in the five minutes following stunning. It was concluded that the Crustastun™ is an acceptable method for killing P. zealandicus and for stunning all but the largest J. edwardsii. | |
| dc.description.confidential | false | |
| dc.edition.edition | 2023 | |
| dc.format.pagination | e57- | |
| dc.identifier.author-url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38487437 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Kells NJ, Perrott M, Johnson CB. (2023). The efficacy of electrical stunning of New Zealand rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) and freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus) using the Crustastun™.. Anim Welf. 32. (pp. e57-). | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/awf.2023.76 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2054-1538 | |
| dc.identifier.elements-type | journal-article | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0962-7286 | |
| dc.identifier.number | e57 | |
| dc.identifier.pii | S0962728623000763 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/71322 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare | |
| dc.publisher.uri | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/animal-welfare/article/efficacy-of-electrical-stunning-of-new-zealand-rock-lobster-jasus-edwardsii-and-freshwater-crayfish-paranephrops-zealandicus-using-the-crustastun/2ABE0148944688CE3A1CE253ABB06DC7 | |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Anim Welf | |
| dc.rights | (c) 2023 The Author/s | |
| dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Crustastun™ | |
| dc.subject | animal welfare | |
| dc.subject | decapod crustacea | |
| dc.subject | electrical stunning | |
| dc.subject | neurophysiology | |
| dc.subject | slaughter | |
| dc.title | The efficacy of electrical stunning of New Zealand rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) and freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus) using the Crustastun™ | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.elements-id | 484698 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Other |