Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of immobilization with three different drug combinations in free-ranging African lions

dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume11
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson AC
dc.contributor.authorMeyer LCR
dc.contributor.authorFuller A
dc.contributor.authorBuss PE
dc.contributor.editorSeebacher F
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-15T01:53:34Z
dc.date.available2025-09-15T01:53:34Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-12
dc.description.abstractThirty-six free-ranging lions (12 per group) were immobilized with tiletamine-zolazepam (Zoletil 0.6 mg/kg i.m.) plus medetomidine (0.036 mg/kg i.m.) (TZM), ketamine (3.0 mg/kg i.m.) plus medetomidine (0.036 mg/kg i.m.) (KM) or ketamine (1.2 mg/kg i.m.) plus butorphanol (0.24 mg/kg i.m.) plus medetomidine (0.036 mg/kg i.m.) (KBM). During immobilization cardiovascular variables were monitored at 5-minute intervals for a period of 30 minutes. Lions immobilized with all three drug combinations were severely hypertensive. Systolic arterial pressure was higher at initial sampling in lions immobilized with KM (237.3 ± 24.8 mmHg) than in those immobilized with TZM (221.0 ± 18.1 mmHg) or KBM (226.0 ± 20.6 mmHg) and decreased to 205.8 ± 19.4, 197.7 ± 23.7 and 196.3 ± 17.7 mmHg, respectively. Heart rates were within normal ranges for healthy, awake lions and decreased throughout the immobilization regardless of drug combination used. Lions immobilized with TZM had a higher occurrence (66%) of skipped heart beats than those immobilized with KBM (25%). The three drug combinations all caused negative cardiovascular effects, which were less when KBM was used, but adverse enough to warrant further investigations to determine if these effects can be reversed or prevented when these three combinations are used to immobilize free-living lions.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.edition.edition2023
dc.identifier.citationDonaldson AC, Meyer LCR, Fuller A, Buss PE. (2023). Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of immobilization with three different drug combinations in free-ranging African lions. Conservation Physiology. 11. 1.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/conphys/coac077
dc.identifier.eissn2051-1434
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.numbercoac077
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/73550
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherOxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Experimental Biology
dc.publisher.urihttp://academic.oup.com/conphys/article/11/1/coac077/6972767
dc.relation.isPartOfConservation Physiology
dc.rights(c) 2023 The Author/s
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectskipped heart beats
dc.subjectmedetomidine
dc.subjecthypertension
dc.subjectheart rate
dc.titleComparison of the cardiovascular effects of immobilization with three different drug combinations in free-ranging African lions
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id503129
pubs.organisational-groupOther

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
503129 PDF.pdf
Size:
909.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version.pdf

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections