The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals – A commentary

dc.contributor.authorPerezgonzalez JD
dc.date.available2017-05-02
dc.date.issued2017-05-02
dc.description.abstract‘The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals’ (Morey et al., 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8) delved into a much needed technical and philosophical dissertation regarding the differences between typical (mis)interpretations of frequentist confidence intervals and the typical correct interpretation of Bayesian credible intervals. My contribution here partly strengthens the authors’ argument, partly closes some gaps they left open, and concludes with a note of attention to the possibility that there may be distinctions without real practical differences in the ultimate use of estimation by intervals, namely when assuming a common ground of uninformative priors and intervals as ranges of values instead of as posterior distributions per se.
dc.description.publication-statusPublished online
dc.identifierhttps://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kvxc4
dc.identifier.citation2017
dc.identifier.doi10.17605/OSF.IO/4V8QG
dc.identifier.elements-id348268
dc.identifier.harvestedMassey_Dark
dc.publisherOpen Science Framework (OSF)
dc.publisher.urihttps://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kvxc4
dc.relation.urihttps://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/kvxc4
dc.subjectStatistical inference
dc.subjectCredible interval
dc.subjectConfidence interval
dc.titleThe fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals – A commentary
dc.typeinternet
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/Massey Business School
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/Massey Business School/School of Aviation
Files
Collections