Understanding subjective memory complaints in ageing : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand

Thumbnail Image
Open Access Location
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Massey University
The Author
Everyday memory difficulties are a common experience with age, and cause considerable distress for many people when they are interpreted as potential indicators of age-related disease. However, research literature examining the relationship between these difficulties (known as subjective memory complaints; SMCs) and actual memory performance on neuropsychological tests has shown mixed results, suggesting that SMCs are not a pure reflection of memory ability, but instead that their aetiology is complicated and not fully understood. Both psychological and methodological factors are also implicated, although no research has yet comprehensively examined how a combination of these factors might predict SMCs. The current research aimed to test a new aetiological model of SMCs that incorporated a range of potential confounds. It was hypothesised that SMCs would be predicted by measures of processing speed and executive functioning, and that this relationship would be moderated by measures of anxiety and depression. First, a meta-analysis and systematic review of existing research on the relationship between subjective and objective memory was conducted as a platform to inform subsequent analyses. Then, Study A addressed current variation in assessment methods by describing differences in SMCs when assessed with both an open-ended measure and a prescriptive questionnaire. Study B examined how these differences in subjective reports related to objective memory performance. Finally, Study C tested the proposed aetiological model of SMCs. Study A showed that different measures of SMCs garnered non-overlapping reports. SMCs gathered via the open-ended measure were fewer in number, but rated as more distressing, than those endorsed on the questionnaire. Spontaneous reports appeared to be more ecologically valid reflections of SMCs, although questionnaire assessments were by their nature more robust to a “catch 22” situation whereby some endorsed SMCs were not reported spontaneously (perhaps due to memory failures in themselves). Study B found that neither method of assessing SMCs produced reports that were significantly convergent with objective measures of memory functioning. Study C found partial support for the hypothesised aetiological model. SMCs (as assessed by the questionnaire) were inversely related to processing speed, but only when depressive symptoms were relatively high. Collectively, results offer important insights into the interaction of cognitive and psychological factors in explaining SMCs, and highlight the previously undelineated context in which processing speed contributes to SMCs.
Cognition in old age, Memory in old age, Performance anxiety, Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Social sciences::Psychology::Cognitive science