An nLCA approach to support consumer meal decisions: a New Zealand case study of toppings on toast
| dc.citation.volume | 8 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Majumdar S | |
| dc.contributor.author | McLaren SJ | |
| dc.contributor.author | van der Pols JC | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lister CE | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Dutt S | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-03T02:12:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-03T02:12:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-05-09 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: This study investigates the development and potential application of a nutritional Life Cycle Assessment (nLCA) method to rank meals, using a case study of a “toppings on toast” (ToTs) meal. Methodological issues are investigated in the context of application to support consumers to make more informed food choices at the meal level. Methods: Fourteen selected “toppings on toast” (ToTs) commonly consumed in New Zealand (NZ) were evaluated for their climate change impacts and nutritional value using the serve size of each topping as the functional unit (FU). NZ-specific climate change values were obtained from an existing database and recent literature. Nutritional value was calculated using the NRF family of indices – specifically the NRF9.3 and NRF28.3 indices (the latter constructed for this study to include all nutrients in the selected toppings for which reference values were available) and presented in a separate midpoint nutrition impact category. The NRF and climate change scores were assigned quartile-based weights, and the weight of each index score was averaged with that of the climate change score. Based on these average values, the toppings were ranked in two ranking sets (one for each index). In a sensitivity analysis, two alternative reference units were also used (100 g and 100 kcal) to investigate how different FUs influenced the final rankings. Results: The results showed that use of one or other NRF index affected the magnitude of the nLCA results; however, the rankings of the ToTs based on the nLCA results did not change much between the two indices. Avocado and peanut butter performed the best (top two ranks), and bacon, butter, and cheese were the poorest performers (bottom two ranks), for both the ranking sets. The toppings which did change ranks mostly moved up or down by only one position. Thus, the results of this case study suggest that the NRF9.3 index is sufficient to determine overall the best, medium, and worst performing toppings in the ToT meal context. However, the results also showed that water-soluble vitamins and unsaturated fats included in the NRF28.3 index contributed significantly to the nutritional scores for most of the toppings and were instrumental in the rank changes for the toppings which are particularly rich in these nutrients. Discussion: Thus, for a more diverse range of toppings/meals, an expanded index including these nutrients can generate more nuanced rankings. This study contributes to the nascent but fast-growing nLCA research field, particularly within the meal context. The method used in this case study could be applied in food composition databases, restaurant menus, and websites/apps that provides recipes for meals. However, the study also highlighted the potentially significant variability in climate change and nutritional values in the toppings associated with different production practices, seasonality, and different varieties of the same product. Any future development of nLCA-based meal level rankings should address this variability and communicate it to the consumer. | |
| dc.description.confidential | false | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Majumdar S, McLaren SJ, van der Pols JC, Lister CE. (2024). An nLCA approach to support consumer meal decisions: a New Zealand case study of toppings on toast. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 8. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fsufs.2024.1363565 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2571-581X | |
| dc.identifier.elements-type | journal-article | |
| dc.identifier.number | 1363565 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/71588 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. | |
| dc.publisher.uri | https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1363565/full | |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems | |
| dc.rights | (c) 2024 The Author/s | |
| dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | nLCA | |
| dc.subject | life cycle assessment | |
| dc.subject | nutrition | |
| dc.subject | climate change | |
| dc.subject | meals | |
| dc.title | An nLCA approach to support consumer meal decisions: a New Zealand case study of toppings on toast | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.elements-id | 489089 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | College of Health |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1