Bridging the Archipelago: Toward an Integrative Approach to Studying Bureaucratic Politicization
| dc.citation.issue | 2 | |
| dc.citation.volume | 7 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Belloir A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shaw R | |
| dc.contributor.author | Van den Berg C | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-13T01:55:38Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-13T01:55:38Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-06-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Despite ample attention to bureaucratic politicization in the public administration literature, most research remains siloed, focusing on individual forms of politicization (formal, functional, or administrative) and limited to single-country analyses. When a comparative stance is adopted, it often concentrates on comparing countries with the same administrative tradition (e.g., Westminster countries). This paper advocates for a comprehensive comparative research approach that integrates all forms and spans administrative traditions, treating the three forms of politicization as analytically distinct but empirically interdependent. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with senior civil servants (n=27) in four countries with distinct administrative tradition - Ireland (Westminster), the Netherlands (Germanic), Norway (Scandinavian), and Spain (Napoleonic) – the study introduces an integrated typology and applies it to demonstrate how politicization manifests across various administrative contexts. The findings reveal that politicization is best understood as a composite phenomenon shaped by institutional rules, organizational practices, and civil servants’ interpretive behaviors. This study provides a cross-dimensional, comparative lens that not only bridges conceptual silos, but also offers a more nuanced, context-sensitive understanding of how politicization unfolds in practice. | |
| dc.description.confidential | false | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Belloir A, Shaw R, Van den Berg C. (2025). Bridging the Archipelago: Toward an Integrative Approach to Studying Bureaucratic Politicization. International Review of Public Policy. 7. 2. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.4000/14mnl | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2706-6274 | |
| dc.identifier.elements-type | journal-article | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/73682 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.publisher | International Public Policy Association | |
| dc.publisher.uri | https://journals.openedition.org/irpp/5307 | |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | International Review of Public Policy | |
| dc.rights | (c) 2025 The Author/s | |
| dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | bureaucratic politicization | |
| dc.subject | civil service | |
| dc.subject | administrative traditions | |
| dc.subject | political-administrative relations | |
| dc.subject | bureaucracy | |
| dc.title | Bridging the Archipelago: Toward an Integrative Approach to Studying Bureaucratic Politicization | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.elements-id | 502962 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Other |