What's in a database? Insights from a retrospective review of penguin necropsy records in Aotearoa New Zealand

Simple item page
dc.citation.issue4
dc.citation.volume20
dc.contributor.authorSaverimuttu S
dc.contributor.authorHunter S
dc.contributor.authorGartrell B
dc.contributor.authorMcInnes K
dc.contributor.authorWarren K
dc.contributor.authorPas A
dc.contributor.authorChatterton J
dc.contributor.authorYeap L
dc.contributor.authorJackson B
dc.contributor.editorRaverty S
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-06T03:16:04Z
dc.date.available2025-06-06T03:16:04Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-30
dc.description.abstractWildlife necropsy databases often provide data for morbidity and mortality studies of free-ranging species, with implicit relevance for conservation goals, as well as domestic animal and human health. Retrospective reviews are a common way to derive insights from such opportunistic data, despite the methodological difficulties of performing these analyses, alongside findings being prone to bias. This study reviews morbidity and mortality data from Sphenisciformes of Aotearoa New Zealand, using records extracted and manually refined from submissions to the national Wildbase Pathology Register. The review corroborates the broader consensus that hoiho (yellow eyed penguin, Megadyptes antipodes) are most commonly diagnosed with infectious/inflammatory disease (43.1%, 422/978 diagnoses), kororā (blue penguin, Eudyptula minor) with traumatic injuries (42.9%, 156/364 diagnoses), and emaciation being a common finding across both species (33.9%, 393/1463 diagnoses). Further, there are marked spatiotemporal trends in submissions, driven primarily by the affected species and the submitting organisations, highlighting the biases within such databases that must be factored into the application of results. Typographical errors, redundancies from synonymous terms, and missing data are captured as barriers to performing manual reviews of free-text data. Overall, this study highlights strengths and limitations of storage and review of wildlife necropsy data while providing insight into threats faced by the penguins of Aotearoa.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.format.paginatione0321975-
dc.identifier.citationSaverimuttu S, Hunter S, Gartrell B, McInnes K, Warren K, Pas A, Chatterton J, Yeap L, Jackson B. (2025). What's in a database? Insights from a retrospective review of penguin necropsy records in Aotearoa New Zealand. PloS one. 20. 4. (pp. e0321975-).
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0321975
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.numbere0321975
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/73009
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherPLOS
dc.publisher.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0321975
dc.relation.isPartOfPloS one
dc.rights(c) 2025 The Author/s
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleWhat's in a database? Insights from a retrospective review of penguin necropsy records in Aotearoa New Zealand
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id500827
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
500827 PDF.pdf
Size:
1.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version.pdf
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles