Diagnosing and designing process stability and adaptability at Transpower New Zealand Limited using the Process Warrant of Fitness and the Viable Process Model : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Quality Systems at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Loading...
Date
2019
DOI
Open Access Location
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Massey University
Rights
The Author
Abstract
This research developed an evaluative model and tool incorporating principles and practices
of the Work Systems Method (WSM) and Viable System Model (VSM) to assess the viability
of processes at Transpower NZ Limited, a New Zealand State Owned Enterprise. The
assessment tool looks for opportunities to sustain process identity, as well as identifying the
potential for enhanced planning, control, and coordination of the work, and preserving
connections to the outside world, including suppliers, customers, and regulators. Eight
employees took part in interviews to reveal Transpower’s collective process requirements.
These requirements became a key input into the assessment tool, called the Process Warrant
of Fitness (WOF). The tool was tested on a range of Transpower processes, successfully
identifying viability enhancement opportunities. The assessment tool was then tested on two
non-Transpower processes to gauge its applicability outside of Transpower. To lower the
barriers to adoption of the tool, an end to end user participation format, called the Viable
Process Model (VPM) was also developed, further drawing on WSM and VSM principles. The
VPM guides the user to identify processes to assess, apply the assessment tool, and
undertake post-assessment activities. While each workplace may appear to have its own
unique process viability challenges, the assessment tool and user participation format
showed potential as a universal pathway to process viability, having identified opportunities
in the organisations that had its processes assessed.
Description
Figures 2.1 (=Weckenmann et al., 2015 Fig 6) & 2.2 (=Hildbrand & Bodhanya, 2015 Fig 1) were removed for copyright reasons.
Keywords
Transpower New Zealand Limited, Evaluation, Organizational effectiveness, New Zealand, Measurement, System analysis
