Assessment of dispersion of airborne particles of oral/nasal fluid by high flow nasal cannula therapy

Simple item page
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.volume16
dc.contributor.authorJermy MC
dc.contributor.authorSpence CJT
dc.contributor.authorKirton R
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell JF
dc.contributor.authorKabaliuk N
dc.contributor.authorGaw S
dc.contributor.authorHockey H
dc.contributor.authorJiang Y
dc.contributor.authorZulkhairi Abidin Z
dc.contributor.authorDougherty RL
dc.contributor.authorRowe P
dc.contributor.authorMahaliyana AS
dc.contributor.authorGibbs A
dc.contributor.authorRoberts SA
dc.date.available2021-02-12
dc.date.available2021-01-13
dc.date.issued12/02/2021
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Nasal High Flow (NHF) therapy delivers flows of heated humidified gases up to 60 LPM (litres per minute) via a nasal cannula. Particles of oral/nasal fluid released by patients undergoing NHF therapy may pose a cross-infection risk, which is a potential concern for treating COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Liquid particles within the exhaled breath of healthy participants were measured with two protocols: (1) high speed camera imaging and counting exhaled particles under high magnification (6 participants) and (2) measuring the deposition of a chemical marker (riboflavin-5-monophosphate) at a distance of 100 and 500 mm on filter papers through which air was drawn (10 participants). The filter papers were assayed with HPLC. Breathing conditions tested included quiet (resting) breathing and vigorous breathing (which here means nasal snorting, voluntary coughing and voluntary sneezing). Unsupported (natural) breathing and NHF at 30 and 60 LPM were compared. RESULTS: Imaging: During quiet breathing, no particles were recorded with unsupported breathing or 30 LPM NHF (detection limit for single particles 33 μm). Particles were detected from 2 of 6 participants at 60 LPM quiet breathing at approximately 10% of the rate caused by unsupported vigorous breathing. Unsupported vigorous breathing released the greatest numbers of particles. Vigorous breathing with NHF at 60 LPM, released half the number of particles compared to vigorous breathing without NHF. Chemical marker tests: No oral/nasal fluid was detected in quiet breathing without NHF (detection limit 0.28 μL/m3). In quiet breathing with NHF at 60 LPM, small quantities were detected in 4 out of 29 quiet breathing tests, not exceeding 17 μL/m3. Vigorous breathing released 200-1000 times more fluid than the quiet breathing with NHF. The quantities detected in vigorous breathing were similar whether using NHF or not. CONCLUSION: During quiet breathing, 60 LPM NHF therapy may cause oral/nasal fluid to be released as particles, at levels of tens of μL per cubic metre of air. Vigorous breathing (snort, cough or sneeze) releases 200 to 1000 times more oral/nasal fluid than quiet breathing (p < 0.001 with both imaging and chemical marker methods). During vigorous breathing, 60 LPM NHF therapy caused no statistically significant difference in the quantity of oral/nasal fluid released compared to unsupported breathing. NHF use does not increase the risk of dispersing infectious aerosols above the risk of unsupported vigorous breathing. Standard infection prevention and control measures should apply when dealing with a patient who has an acute respiratory infection, independent of which, if any, respiratory support is being used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12614000924651.
dc.description.publication-statusPublished
dc.identifierhttp://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000620071700052&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=c5bb3b2499afac691c2e3c1a83ef6fef
dc.identifierARTN e0246123
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (2)
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0246123
dc.identifier.elements-id440401
dc.identifier.harvestedMassey_Dark
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10179/16292
dc.publisherPLOS
dc.relation.isPartOfPLOS ONE
dc.titleAssessment of dispersion of airborne particles of oral/nasal fluid by high flow nasal cannula therapy
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.notesNot known
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/College of Health
pubs.organisational-group/Massey University/College of Health/School of Nursing
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Assessment of dispersion of airborne particles of oralnasal fluid by high flow nasal cannula therapy.pdf
Size:
882.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles