Relationships among body size components of three flightless New Zealand grasshopper species (Orthoptera, Acrididae) and their ecological applications

dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume31
dc.contributor.authorMeza-Joya FL
dc.contributor.authorMorgan-Richards M
dc.contributor.authorTrewick SA
dc.contributor.editorCigliano M-M
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T01:00:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T06:40:08Z
dc.date.available2022-06-16
dc.date.available2024-01-30T01:00:58Z
dc.date.available2024-07-25T06:40:08Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-16
dc.description.abstractBody size is perhaps the most fundamental property of an organism and is central to ecology at multiple scales, yet obtaining accurate estimates of ecologically meaningful size metrics, such as body mass, is often impractical. Allometric scaling and mass-to-mass relationships have been used as alternative approaches to model the expected body mass of many species. However, models for predicting body size in key herbivorous insects, such as grasshoppers, exist only at the family level. To address this data gap, we collected empirical body size data (hind femur length and width, pronotum length, live fresh mass, ethanol-preserved mass, and dry mass) from 368 adult grasshoppers of three flightless species at Hamilton Peak, Southern Alps, New Zealand. We examined the relationships among body size components across all species using linear and non-linear regression models. Femur length and preserved mass were robust predictors of both fresh mass and dry mass across all species; however, regressions using preserved mass as a predictor always showed higher predictive power than those using femur length. Based on our results, we developed species-specific statistical linear mixed-effects models to estimate the fresh and dry masses of individual grasshoppers from their preserved mass and femur length. Including sex as an additional co-variate increased model fit in some cases but did not produce better estimates than traditional mass-to-mass and allometric scaling regressions. Overall, our results showed that two easy-to-measure, unambiguous, highly repeatable, and non-destructive size measures (i.e., preserved mass and femur length) can predict, to an informative level of accuracy, fresh and dry body mass across three flightless grasshopper species. Knowledge about the relationships between body dimensions and body mass estimates in these grasshoppers has several important ecological applications, which are discussed.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.format.pagination91-103
dc.identifier.citationMeza-Joya FL, Morgan-Richards M, Trewick SA. (2022). Relationships among body size components of three flightless New Zealand grasshopper species (Orthoptera, Acrididae) and their ecological applications. Journal of Orthoptera Research. 31. 1. (pp. 91-103).
dc.identifier.doi10.3897/jor.31.79819
dc.identifier.eissn1937-2426
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn1082-6467
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/70647
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherPensoft Publishers on behalf of the Orthopterists’ Society
dc.publisher.urihttps://jor.pensoft.net/article/79819/
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Orthoptera Research
dc.rights(c) The author/sen
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectallometric scaling
dc.subjectbody mass
dc.subjectlinear body dimension
dc.subjectmass-to-mass relationships
dc.subjectpredictive models
dc.titleRelationships among body size components of three flightless New Zealand grasshopper species (Orthoptera, Acrididae) and their ecological applications
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id455595
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Published
Size:
1.71 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Evidence
Size:
330 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Collections