Dealing with sparsity in genotype x environment analyses : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

Godfrey, A. Jonathan R.

Dealing with sparsity in genotype x environment analyses : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

dc.contributor.author	Godfrey, A. Jonathan R.
dc.date.accessioned	2010-09-06T03:53:10Z
dc.date.available	NO_RESTRICTION	en_US
dc.date.available	2010-09-06T03:53:10Z
dc.date.issued	2004
dc.description.abstract	Researchers are frequently faced with the problem of analyzing incomplete and often unbalanced genotype-by-environment (GxE) matrices which arise as a trials programme progresses over seasons. The principal data for this investigation, arising from a ten year programme of onion trials, has less than 2,300 of the 49,200 combinations from the 400 genotypes and 123 environments. This 'sparsity' renders standard GxE methodology inapplicable. Analysis of this data to identify onion varieties that suit the shorter, hotter days of tropical and subtropical locations therefore presented a unique challenge. Removal of some data to form a complete GxE matrix wastes information and is consequently undesirable. An incomplete GxE matrix can be analyzed using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model in conjunction with the EM algorithm but proved unsatisfactory in this instance. Cluster analysis has been commonly used in GxE analyses, but current methods are inadequate when the data matrix is incomplete. If clustering is to be applied to incomplete data sets, one of two routes needs to be taken: either the clustering procedure must be modified to handle the missing data, or the missing entries must be imputed so that standard cluster analysis can be performed. A new clustering method capable of handling incomplete data has been developed. 'Two-stage clustering', as it has been named, relies on a partitioning of squared Euclidean distance into two independent components, the GxE interaction and the genotype main effect. These components are used in the first and second stages of clustering respectively. Two-stage clustering forms the basis for imputing missing values in a GxE matrix, so that a more complete data array is available for other GxE analyses. 'Two-stage imputation' estimates unobserved GxE yields using inter-genotype similarities to adjust observed yield data in the environment in which the yield is missing. This new imputation method is transferrable to any two-way data situation where all observations are measured on the same scale and the two factors are expected to have significant interaction. This simple, but effective, imputation method is shown to improve on an existing method that confounds the GxE interaction and the genotype main effect. Future development of two-stage imputation will use a parameterization of two-stage clustering in a multiple imputation process. Varieties recommended for use in a certain environment would normally be chosen using results from similar environments. Differing cluster analysis approaches were applied, but led to inconsistent environment clusterings. A graphical summary tool, created to ease the difficulty in identifying the differences between pairs of clusterings, proved especially useful when the number of clusters and clustered observations were high. 'Cluster influence diagrams' were also used to investigate the effects the new imputation method had on the qualitative structure of the data. A consequence of the principal data's sparsity was that imputed values were found to be dependent on the existence of observable inter-genotype relationships, rather than the strength of these observable relationships. As a result of this investigation, practical recommendations are provided for limiting the detrimental effects of sparsity. Applying these recommendations will enhance the future ability of two-stage imputation to identify those onion varieties that suit tropical and subtropical locations.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10179/1616
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Massey University	en_US
dc.rights	The Author	en_US
dc.subject	Statistical analysis	en_US
dc.subject	Onion genotypes	en_US
dc.subject.other	Fields of Research::230000 Mathematical Sciences::230200 Statistics::230204 Applied statistics	en_US
dc.title	Dealing with sparsity in genotype x environment analyses : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Statistics at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US
massey.contributor.author	Godfrey, A. Jonathan R.
thesis.degree.discipline	Statistics	en_US
thesis.degree.grantor	Massey University	en_US
thesis.degree.level	Doctoral	en_US
thesis.degree.level	Doctoral	en
thesis.degree.name	Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)	en_US