Integrative medicine : a contested practice : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology at Massey University, Albany, New Zealand
Loading...
Date
2012
DOI
Open Access Location
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Massey University
Rights
The Author
Abstract
In contemporary Western society, the healthcare arena has become increasingly
technology-based, rationalised and specialised with alternative forms of medicine being
taken up alongside orthodox medicine. This shifting healthcare terrain has brought forth
challenges to practitioners' and patients' identity and to the practitioner-patient
relationship. Today, the expertise and autonomy underpinning general practitioners'
professional identity has been challenged. In parallel, patients have become
reconceptualised from subjects in need of medical expertise, to 'informed' and 'active'
health consumers. Within this fluid healthcare arena integrative medicine (IM) is emerging,
a practice which amalgamates orthodox medicine with forms of alternative medicine. This
emerging form of healthcare produces a number of paradoxes. These occur around the
paradigm clash between treatment philosophies, issues of professionalism and the
standardisation of treatments, power relationships and debates around dominance and
subordination, and issues relating to patient autonomy and treatment responsibility. A
discursive analysis of IM practitioners' and patients' talk reveals that the practice of IM
gives rise to a number of contradictions and challenges for both IM practitioners and
patients. Practitioners draw on discourses of holism, liberal humanism, spirituality and
empowerment to construct IM as a healthcare model which maintains elements of both
allopathic and alternative medicine in place, but also to legitimate practices inherent in IM.
Through doing so, they reconstruct their medical professional identity. In conjunction,
patients' draw on practitioners' extended knowledge-base and open-mindedness to
construct IM practitioners as trustworthy professionals and to legitimate their own
engagement in exploratory forms of treatment. This has implications for patients' and
practitioners' subjectivity. Patients become individuals who deserve to be understood on a
multitude of levels: psychologically, spiritually, emotionally and physically through which
they gain recognition. Concurrently, practitioners' become placed in a paradoxical position
with respect to their practice. They resolve this by resisting the position of biomedical
expert and by incorporating a range of alternative medicine treatments to extend the
healthcare they offer to patients. In conclusion, the practice of IM is shown to legitimate
patients' engagement in self-reflexivity practices and to reproduce Cartesian dualism.
Further, the research reveals how discourses of holism and empowerment, that are held to
represent the fundamental difference between allopathic and alternative medicine, are
drawn on by practitioners to legitimate a more in depth practice and a deeper level of
engagement with patients. Finally, the research questions whether IM constitutes a truly
'integrative' medicine.
Description
Keywords
Healthcare, Health care, Integrative medicine, Alternative medicine, Orthodox medicine, Complementary medicine