Rapid Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis of Self-Guided Interventions to Address Anxiety, Depression, and Stress During COVID-19 Social Distancing

Simple item page
dc.citation.volume11
dc.contributor.authorFischer R
dc.contributor.authorBortolini T
dc.contributor.authorKarl JA
dc.contributor.authorZilberberg M
dc.contributor.authorRobinson K
dc.contributor.authorRabelo A
dc.contributor.authorGemal L
dc.contributor.authorWegerhoff D
dc.contributor.authorNguyễn TBTN
dc.contributor.authorIrving B
dc.contributor.authorChrystal M
dc.contributor.authorMattos P
dc.contributor.editorTreadway D
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-29T21:35:19Z
dc.date.available2024-05-29T21:35:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-28
dc.description.abstractWe conducted a rapid review and quantitative summary of meta-analyses that have examined interventions which can be used by individuals during quarantine and social distancing to manage anxiety, depression, stress, and subjective well-being. A literature search yielded 34 meta-analyses (total number of studies k = 1,390, n = 145,744) that were summarized. Overall, self-guided interventions showed small to medium effects in comparison to control groups. In particular, self-guided therapeutic approaches (including cognitive-behavioral, mindfulness, and acceptance-based interventions), selected positive psychology interventions, and multi-component and activity-based interventions (music, physical exercise) showed promising evidence for effectiveness. Overall, self-guided interventions on average did not show the same degree of effectiveness as traditional guided individual or group therapies. There was no consistent evidence of dose effects, baseline differences, and differential effectiveness of eHealth interventions. More research on the effectiveness of interventions in diverse cultural settings is needed.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.edition.edition2020
dc.identifier.citationFischer R, Bortolini T, Karl JA, Zilberberg M, Robinson K, Rabelo A, Gemal L, Wegerhoff D, Nguyễn TBT, Irving B, Chrystal M, Mattos P. (2020). Rapid Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis of Self-Guided Interventions to Address Anxiety, Depression, and Stress During COVID-19 Social Distancing. Frontiers in Psychology. 11.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563876
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.number563876
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/69692
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.
dc.publisher.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563876/full
dc.relation.isPartOfFrontiers in Psychology
dc.rights(c) The author/sen
dc.rights.licenseCC BYen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectself-guided interventions
dc.subjectdepression
dc.subjectanxiety
dc.subjectculture
dc.subjectstress
dc.subjectsubjective well-being
dc.titleRapid Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis of Self-Guided Interventions to Address Anxiety, Depression, and Stress During COVID-19 Social Distancing
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id487846
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Published version.pdf
Size:
1.95 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Evidence
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles