Contextualising clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation: A scoping review and expert consultation

Simple item page
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.volume68
dc.contributor.authorPillay T
dc.contributor.authorPillay M
dc.coverage.spatialSouth Africa
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-07T20:27:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T22:15:07Z
dc.date.available2021-07-29
dc.date.available2023-09-07T20:27:05Z
dc.date.available2023-09-21T22:15:07Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-29
dc.date.updated2023-09-07T02:41:22Z
dc.description© 2021. The Authors.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study explored the available literature on the phenomenon of clinical reasoning and described its influence on the clinical swallow evaluation. By exploring the relationship between clinical reasoning and the clinical swallow evaluation, it is possible to modernise the approach to dysphagia assessment. Objectives: This study aimed to contextualise the available literature on clinical reasoning and the CSE to low-middle income contexts through the use of a scoping review and expert consultation. Method: A scoping review was performed based on the PRISMA-ScR framework. The data was analysed using thematic analysis. Articles were considered if they discussed the clinical swallow evaluation and clinical reasoning, and were published in the last 49 years. Results: Through rigorous electronic and manual searching, 12 articles were identified. This review made an argument for the value of clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation. The results of the study revealed three core themes related to the acquisition, variability and positive impact of clinical reasoning in the clinical swallow evaluation. Conclusion: The results of this review showed that the clinical swallow evaluation is a complex process with significant levels of variability usually linked to the impact of context. This demonstrates that in order to deliver effective and relevant services, despite challenging conditions, healthcare practitioners must depend on clinical reasoning to make appropriate modifications to the assessment process that considers these salient factors.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.format.extente1-e12
dc.identifierhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34342487
dc.identifier.citationPillay T, Pillay M. (2021). Contextualising clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation: A scoping review and expert consultation.. S Afr J Commun Disord. 68. 1. (pp. e1-e12).
dc.identifier.doi10.4102/sajcd.v68i1.832
dc.identifier.eissn2225-4765
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.harvestedMassey_Dark
dc.identifier.issn0379-8046
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/20123
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAOSIS
dc.relation.isPartOfS Afr J Commun Disord
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectclinical reasoning
dc.subjectclinical swallow evaluation
dc.subjectcontextualisation
dc.subjectdysphagia
dc.subjectspeech-language pathology
dc.subjectClinical Reasoning
dc.subjectDeglutition Disorders
dc.subjectDelivery of Health Care
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation
dc.titleContextualising clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation: A scoping review and expert consultation
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id447869
pubs.organisational-groupOther
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
447869.pdf
Size:
1.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Journal Articles