Comparison of maize silage and traditional forage crops in New Zealand : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Science at Massey University, Manawatū Campus, New Zealand

Simple item page
dc.confidentialEmbargo : Noen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMIllner, James
dc.contributor.authorThant, Aung Myo
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T02:45:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T00:39:49Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T02:45:16Z
dc.date.available2023-03-20T00:39:49Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractCattle wintering systems using crops including grazing kale, swede, and fodder beet crops in situ have resulted in soil and water quality deterioration. Nitrate leaching is the most common problem due to the high deposition of urine N driven by excess N intake. Alternative cropping systems offer a potential solution to reduce these environmental problems while maintaining or maximising productivity. We proposed maize silage as an alternative crop because it has high yield potential, flexible feeding requirements, compliments the nutritive value of pasture, and is potentially suitable for more regions in New Zealand in the future due to climate change. However, research needs to determine whether maize silage yield, feed quality and potential nitrate losses during production and utilisation means it is a viable alternative to in situ grazed forage crops in these areas. Field experiments were conducted at Massey University, Tokoroa and Kiwitea to determine forage yield and feed quality, management effects and site differences in 2018/19 and 2019/20. Crop yields and forage N content were utilised to simulate urine N loads from the feeding of these forage crops. The excreted N loads were analysed in APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator) to predict nitrate leaching losses. Maize produced significantly higher yields compared with the winter forage crops at all Massey University trials while producing competitive yields at Tokoroa and Kiwitea. Yields ranged from 10,940 to 30,417 kg DM/ha for maize whilst wide and lower yield ranges were observed for the winter forage crops (4,579 to 22,928 kg DM/ha). Irrigation increased yields of forage crops by 29-63%. Similarly, nitrogen fertiliser increased yield by 30%, on average. The faster canopy development of maize has the advantage of intercepting more radiation in summer and suppressing weeds, contributing to greater growth and yield despite a shorter crop season. All forage crops produced forage with good metabolisable energy content (MJ/kg DM); higher values in swede (10.1-14.5) and fodder beet (10.8-14.9) whereas intermediate values in kale (8.9-12.7) and maize (9.9-12.2). However, maize was the highest energy-yielding crop, ranging from about 200-316 GJ/ha while other crops varied from 34 to 217 GJ/ha. Protein content in kale (7.5-16.6% DM) and swede (11.4-18.2% DM) were adequate for non-lactating cows whereas maize (5.4-9.2% DM) and fodder beet (7.6-11.2% DM) were lower than recommended protein levels for dairy cows but offering an opportunity to reduce urinary N excretion. Maize also had recommended fibre content. With higher sugar contents, swede and fodder beet were poor in fibre sources, potentially prone to rumen acidosis unless considered mixed diet with high fibre feed. APSIM modelling indicated that maize would produce the lowest urine N output while swede the highest in simulated feeding. Accordingly, N loads/ha was higher for winter forage crops especially when good yields were produced. When common feeding practices were considered, i.e., off-paddock maize feeding (no urine N deposition) and on-paddock grazing of winter forage crops (high urine N deposition), simulated nitrate losses from maize cropping systems were the lowest. Predicted nitrate losses were 21 and 32 kg N/ha for maize under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions. A ryegrass cover crop further reduced simulated nitrate losses by 20-30%. Predicted nitrate losses for fodder beet, kale, and swede crops were 126, 162, 154 kg N/ha under irrigated conditions and 72, 201, 199 kg N/ha under non-irrigated conditions, respectively in grazing systems.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/18099
dc.publisherMassey Universityen_US
dc.rightsThe Authoren_US
dc.subjectDairy cattleen
dc.subjectFeeding and feedsen
dc.subjectCornen
dc.subjectSilageen
dc.subjectForage plantsen
dc.subjectCrops and nitrogenen
dc.subjectSoilsen
dc.subjectNitrogen contenten
dc.subjectLeachingen
dc.subjectNew Zealanden
dc.subjectAPSIMen
dc.subjectdairyen
dc.subjectfertiliser applicationen
dc.subjectfodder beeten
dc.subjectforage brassicasen
dc.subjectirrigationen
dc.subjectin situ grazingen
dc.subjectkaleen
dc.subjectmaize silageen
dc.subjectmodellingen
dc.subjectnitrate leachingen
dc.subjectnitrogenen
dc.subjectoff-paddock feedingen
dc.subjectsimulationsen
dc.subjectswedeen
dc.subjectwinteringen
dc.subject.anzsrc300403 Agronomyen
dc.titleComparison of maize silage and traditional forage crops in New Zealand : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Science at Massey University, Manawatū Campus, New Zealanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
massey.contributor.authorThant, Aung Myoen_US
thesis.degree.disciplinePlant Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.grantorMassey Universityen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ThantPhDThesis.pdf
Size:
4.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Theses and Dissertations