Mediating pathways between resilience, mental health and wellbeing: a scoping review of individual, social, and systemic factors

Abstract

Background Resilience strongly predicts health and wellbeing across populations, but mediating pathways may vary between cultural and socioeconomic contexts. This scoping review examines the mediating variables that explain the relationships between resilience, mental health and wellbeing across different socioeconomic contexts.

Methods Following a literature search of four databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, and CINAHL), we identified 824 potentially relevant papers. After rigorous screening using predefined inclusion criteria, 24 high-quality studies were included in the final review. Two independent reviewers assessed methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools.

Findings Three levels of mediating pathways emerged: individual factors (self-esteem, self-efficacy, mindfulness, self-compassion, coping strategies, emotional regulation); social factors (family support, social networks, community resources); and systemic factors (economic security, digital inclusion, burnout, religious coping). Resilience was consistently associated with better wellbeing, but mediating factors varied by context. In impoverished contexts, structural determinants of economic stability, service availability, and social protection schemes were pivotal in how resilience is enacted to shape wellbeing. In advantaged contexts, internal psychological capacities and social support emerged as primary mediators through which resilience shapes wellbeing. Studies in Western contexts focused on individual factors, while studies in Eastern environments highlighted social factors. Studies in Middle Eastern settings emphasised religious coping mechanisms, while Global South research prioritised resource availability. During acute crises (COVID-19) positive reappraisal and stress recovery were critical mediators, whereas chronic adversity contexts emphasised social support networks and coping mechanisms.

Conclusion Resilience and wellbeing operate through distinct mediation pathways influenced by social, cultural, and environmental factors. Interventions should target context-specific mediators rather than employing generalised strategies. Future research should address knowledge gaps concerning Indigenous populations and employ longitudinal methodologies to establish causality across diverse environments.