Methane emissions from dairy heifers as affected by residual feed intake and breed : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Animal Science at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand

dc.contributor.authorFlay, Holly Ellissa
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T23:32:40Z
dc.date.available2019-07-10T23:32:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionFigures 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.1, 3.2 & 3.3 have been removed for copyright reasons, but may be accessed via their sources listed in the References. Chapter 4 has been published as an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/): Flay, H. E., Kuhn-Sherlock, B., Macdonald, K. A., Camara, M., Lopez-Villalobos, N., Donaghy, D. J., & Roche, J. R. (2019). Hot topic: Selecting cattle for low residual feed intake did not affect daily methane production but increased methane yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(3), 2708–2713. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15234en_US
dc.description.abstractReducing methane (CH4) emissions without reducing milk production requires an improvement in feed conversion efficiency: that is an animal’s efficiency in utilising feed for maintenance and production. Residual feed intake (RFI) is one measure of feed conversion efficiency; it can be defined as the difference between an animal’s actual intake and its predicted intake based on its metabolic size and productivity. More efficient animals eat less than predicted (low RFI); inefficient animals eat more (high RFI). Enteric CH4 is an important source of digestible energy loss in ruminants, and research in beef cattle has reported a positive relationship between RFI and daily CH4 production. Jersey (Jer) cows have also been reported to be more feed efficient than Holstein-Friesian (HF) cows. Thus, I hypothesized that high feed efficient (low RFI) animals would emit less CH4 than the lower efficiency (high RFI) animals, and that Jer heifers would have lower CH4 yield than HF heifers. I measured the CH4 emissions of 56 growing dairy heifers (20-22 mo old) in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement: factors included two breeds (HF and Jer; n=28/breed) and two previously determined RFI categories (low RFI; -2.1 kg DM and high RFI; +2.0 kg DM; n=28/RFI category). All heifers were co-mingled and offered the same diet of dried lucerne cubes. Between RFI categories, heifers did not differ in body weight (BW) or BW gain (BWg); but low RFI heifers had 9.3% and 10.6% lower dry matter intake (DMI) and DMI/kg BW, respectively, than high RFI heifers. Similarly, RFI category did not affect CH4/d or CH4/kg BWg; but, CH4/kg DMI was greater in low RFI heifers because of their lower DMI. These results might reflect more complete digestion of ingested feed in more efficient, low RFI heifers, consistent with previous reports of greater apparent digestibility of organic matter. Breed did not affect DMI/kg BW or BWg; Jersey heifers produced less CH4/d, but not CH4/kg DMI or CH4/kg BWg. In conclusion, selecting dairy heifers for low RFI is unlikely to affect daily CH4 production (g/d), but may increase CH4 yield (g/kg DMI).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10179/14773
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMassey Universityen_US
dc.rightsThe Authoren_US
dc.subjectMethane -- Measurementen_US
dc.subjectMethane -- Environmental aspectsen_US
dc.subjectSulfur hexafluoride as a test gasen_US
dc.subjectDairy cattle -- Feeding and feeds -- Environmental aspectsen_US
dc.subjectHolstein-Friesian cattle -- Feed utilization efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectJersey cattle -- Feed utilization efficiencyen_US
dc.titleMethane emissions from dairy heifers as affected by residual feed intake and breed : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Animal Science at Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
massey.contributor.authorFlay, Holly Ellissa
thesis.degree.disciplineAnimal Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_front.pdf
Size:
360.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
02_whole.pdf
Size:
4.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.32 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: