Security Psychology: New Perspectives From the COVID-19 Pandemic

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2025-12-19

DOI

Open Access Location

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology

Rights

CC BY 4.0
(c) 2025 The Author/s

Abstract

In 1994, the United Nations human security taxonomy signaled a major shift from security as preservation of the nation-state towards a broader and more recent ‘decagonal’ model of human security (entailing everyday needs for personal, health, food, cyber, community, economic, national, environmental, political and, most recently, global security). Building on those foundations, this paper proposes a psychological theory of human security. The latter we propose is a question of ‘systems fit’ between everyday needs and priorities to official responses during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. During COVID-19 lockdowns in 2021, across Australia and New Zealand, we asked N = 2,162 Australasians whether they had each type of security, how important each type was to them, and what each of the 10 sub-types of security meant to them. On face value, a pandemic is a primary threat to national public health. In everyday life, however, all 10 dimensions of human security remained salient and interconnected.

Description

Keywords

Australia, Human Security, New Zealand, Security Psychology, Sustainable Livelihoods, United Nations

Citation

Hopner V, Carr S, Young M, Nelson N, Hodgetts D. (2025). Security Psychology: New Perspectives From the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 13. 2. (pp. 368-383).

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0