Changing methodology results in operational drift in the meaning of leaf area index, necessitating implementation of foliage layer index
| dc.citation.issue | 1 | |
| dc.citation.volume | 8 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rapson GL | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | England | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-08T00:48:47Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-25T06:36:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-12-03 | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-08T00:48:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-25T06:36:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-01-08 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Leaf area index (LAI) was developed to describe the number of layers of foliage in a monoculture. Subsequent expansion into measurement by remote-sensing methods has resulted in misrepresentation of LAI. The new name foliage layer index (FLI) is applied to a more simply estimated version of Goodall's "cover repetition," that is, the number of layers of foliage a single species has, either within a community or in monoculture. The relationship of FLI with cover is demonstrated in model communities, and some potential relationships between FLI and species' habit are suggested. FLIcomm is a new formulation for the number of layers of foliage in a mixed-species' community. LAI should now be reserved for remote-sensing applications in mixed communities, where it is probably a nonlinear measure of the density of light-absorbing pigments. | |
| dc.description.confidential | false | |
| dc.edition.edition | January 2018 | |
| dc.format.pagination | 638-644 | |
| dc.identifier.author-url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321900 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Rapson GL. (2018). Changing methodology results in operational drift in the meaning of leaf area index, necessitating implementation of foliage layer index.. Ecol Evol. 8. 1. (pp. 638-644). | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/ece3.3662 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2045-7758 | |
| dc.identifier.elements-type | journal-article | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2045-7758 | |
| dc.identifier.pii | ECE33662 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/70530 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | John Wiley and Sons Ltd | |
| dc.publisher.uri | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.3662 | |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Ecol Evol | |
| dc.rights | (c) 2017 The Author/s | |
| dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | agriculture | |
| dc.subject | chlorophyll | |
| dc.subject | cover repetition | |
| dc.subject | growth analysis | |
| dc.subject | leaf area | |
| dc.subject | shade‐light | |
| dc.title | Changing methodology results in operational drift in the meaning of leaf area index, necessitating implementation of foliage layer index | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.elements-id | 398041 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Other |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1

