Journal Articles

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Time-to-conception and clinical pregnancy rate with a myo-inositol, probiotics, and micronutrient supplement: secondary outcomes of the NiPPeR randomized trial.
    (Elsevier B.V., 2023-05-26) Chan S-Y; Barton SJ; Loy SL; Chang HF; Titcombe P; Wong J-T; Ebreo M; Ong J; Tan KM; Nield H; El-Heis S; Kenealy T; Chong Y-S; Baker PN; Cutfield WS; Godfrey KM; NiPPeR Study Group
    Objective To determine whether a combined myo-inositol, probiotics and micronutrient nutritional supplement impacts time-to-natural-conception and clinical pregnancy rates. Design Secondary outcomes of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Setting Community recruitment. Patients Women aged 18 to 38 years planning to conceive in the United Kingdom, Singapore, and New Zealand, excluding those with diabetes mellitus or receiving fertility treatment. Intervention A standard (control) supplement (folic acid, iron, calcium, iodine, β-carotene), compared with an intervention additionally containing myo-inositol, probiotics, and other micronutrients (vitamins B2, B6, B12, D, zinc). Main Outcome Measures Number of days between randomization and estimated date of natural conception of a clinical pregnancy, as well as cumulative pregnancy rates at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results Of 1729 women randomized, 1437 (83%; intervention, n=736; control, n=701) provided data. Kaplan-Meier curves of conception were similar between intervention and control groups; the time at which 20% achieved natural conception was 90.5 days (95% confidence interval: 80.7, 103.5) in the intervention group compared with 92.0 days (76.0, 105.1) in the control group. Cox's proportional hazard ratios (HRs) comparing intervention against control for cumulative achievement of pregnancy (adjusted for site, ethnicity, age, body mass index, and gravidity) were similar at 3, 6, and 12 months. Among both study groups combined, overall time-to-conception lengthened with higher preconception body mass index, and was longer in non-White than in White women. Among women who were overweight the intervention shortened time-to-conception compared with control regardless of ethnicity (12-month HR=1.47 [1.07, 2.02], P=.016; 20% conceived by 84.5 vs. 117.0 days) and improved it to that comparable to nonoverweight/nonobese women (20% conceived by 82.1 days). In contrast, among women with obesity, time-to-conception was lengthened with intervention compared with control (12-month HR=0.69 [0.47, 1.00]; P=.053; 20% conceived by 132.7 vs. 108.5 days); an effect predominantly observed in non-White women with obesity. Conclusions Time-to-natural-conception and clinical pregnancy rates within a year were overall similar in women receiving the intervention supplement compared with control. Overweight women had a longer time-to-conception but there was suggestion that the supplement may shorten their time-to-conception to that comparable to the nonoverweight/nonobese women. Further studies are required to confirm this. Clinical Trial Registration Number clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02509988)
  • Item
    Double-blind RCT of fish oil supplementation in pregnancy and lactation to improve the metabolic health in children of mothers with overweight or obesity during pregnancy: study protocol
    (BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2020-12-15) Satokar VV; Cutfield WS; Derraik JGB; Harwood M; Okasene-Gafa K; Beck K; Cameron-Smith D; O'Sullivan JM; Sundborn G; Pundir S; Mason RP; Albert BB
    Introduction Maternal obesity during pregnancy is associated with adverse changes in body composition and metabolism in the offspring. We hypothesise that supplementation during pregnancy of overweight and obese women may help prevent the development of greater adiposity and metabolic dysfunction in children. Previous clinical trials investigating fish oil supplementation in pregnancy on metabolic outcomes and body composition of the children have not focused on the pregnancies of overweight or obese women. Methods and analysis A double-blind randomised controlled trial of fish oil (providing 3 g/day of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids) versus an equal volume of olive oil (control) taken daily from recruitment until birth, and in breastfeeding mothers, further continued for 3 months post partum. Eligible women will have a singleton pregnancy at 12–20 weeks’ gestation and be aged 18–40 years with body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 at baseline. We aim to recruit a minimum of 128 participants to be randomised 1:1. Clinical assessments will be performed at baseline and 30 weeks of pregnancy, including anthropometric measurements, fasting metabolic markers, measures of anxiety, physical activity, quality of life and dietary intake. Subsequent assessments will be performed when the infant is 2 weeks, 3 months and 12 months of age for anthropometry, body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)) and blood sampling. The primary outcome of the study is a between-group difference in infant percentage body fatness, assessed by DXA, at 2 weeks of age. Secondary outcomes will include differences in anthropometric measures at each time point, percentage body fat at 3 and 12 months and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance at 3 months. Statistical analysis will be carried out on the principle of intention to treat. Ethics and dissemination This trial was approved by the Northern A Health and Disabilities Ethics Committee, New Zealand Ministry of Health (17/NTA/154). Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number ACTRN12617001078347p; Pre-results.
  • Item
    Strain engraftment competition and functional augmentation in a multi-donor fecal microbiota transplantation trial for obesity
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2021-12) Wilson BC; Vatanen T; Jayasinghe TN; Leong KSW; Derraik JGB; Albert BB; Chiavaroli V; Svirskis DM; Beck KL; Conlon CA; Jiang Y; Schierding W; Holland DJ; Cutfield WS; O'Sullivan JM
    Background Donor selection is an important factor influencing the engraftment and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for complex conditions associated with microbial dysbiosis. However, the degree, variation, and stability of strain engraftment have not yet been assessed in the context of multiple donors. Methods We conducted a double-blinded randomized control trial of FMT in 87 adolescents with obesity. Participants were randomized to receive multi-donor FMT (capsules containing the fecal microbiota of four sex-matched lean donors) or placebo (saline capsules). Following a bowel cleanse, participants ingested a total of 28 capsules over two consecutive days. Capsules from individual donors and participant stool samples collected at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks post-treatment were analyzed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing allowing us to track bacterial strain engraftment and its functional implications on recipients’ gut microbiomes. Results Multi-donor FMT sustainably altered the structure and the function of the gut microbiome. In what was effectively a microbiome competition experiment, we discovered that two donor microbiomes (one female, one male) dominated strain engraftment and were characterized by high microbial diversity and a high Prevotella to Bacteroides (P/B) ratio. Engrafted strains led to enterotype-level shifts in community composition and provided genes that altered the metabolic potential of the community. Despite our attempts to standardize FMT dose and origin, FMT recipients varied widely in their engraftment of donor strains. Conclusion Our study provides evidence for the existence of FMT super-donors whose microbiomes are highly effective at engrafting in the recipient gut. Dominant engrafting male and female donor microbiomes harbored diverse microbial species and genes and were characterized by a high P/B ratio. Yet, the high variability of strain engraftment among FMT recipients suggests the host environment also plays a critical role in mediating FMT receptivity. Trial registration The Gut Bugs trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615001351505). Trial protocol The trial protocol is available at https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/4/e026174.