Journal Articles

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915

Browse

Filters

2021 - 20233

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Dunowska MSubject: search.filters.subject.Humans

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Cross-species transmission of coronaviruses with a focus on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in animals: a review for the veterinary practitioner.
    (Taylor and Francis Group, 2023-07-01) Dunowska M
    In 2019 a novel coronavirus termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged from an unidentified source and spread rapidly among humans worldwide. While many human infections are mild, some result in severe clinical disease that in a small proportion of infected people is fatal. The pandemic spread of SARS-CoV-2 has been facilitated by efficient human-to-human transmission of the virus, with no data to indicate that animals contributed to this global health crisis. However, a range of domesticated and wild animals are also susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection under both experimental and natural conditions. Humans are presumed to be the source of most animal infections thus far, although natural transmission between mink and between free-ranging deer has occurred, and occasional natural transmission between cats cannot be fully excluded. Considering the ongoing circulation of the virus among people, together with its capacity to evolve through mutation and recombination, the risk of the emergence of animal-adapted variants is not negligible. If such variants remain infectious to humans, this could lead to the establishment of an animal reservoir for the virus, which would complicate control efforts. As such, minimising human-to-animal transmission of SARS-CoV-2 should be considered as part of infection control efforts. The aim of this review is to summarise what is currently known about the species specificity of animal coronaviruses, with an emphasis on SARS-CoV-2, in the broader context of factors that facilitate cross-species transmission of viruses.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Virucidal Efficacy of Blue LED and Far-UVC Light Disinfection against Feline Infectious Peritonitis Virus as a Model for SARS-CoV-2
    (MDPI (Basel, Switzerland), 2021-08) Gardner A; Ghosh S; Dunowska M; Brightwell G; Tannock G; Kim H
    Transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) occurs through respiratory droplets passed directly from person to person or indirectly through fomites, such as common use surfaces or objects. The aim of this study was to determine the virucidal efficacy of blue LED (405 nm) and far-UVC (222 nm) light in comparison to standard UVC (254 nm) irradiation for the inactivation of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) on different matrices as a model for SARS-CoV-2. Wet or dried FIPV on stainless steel, plastic, or paper discs, in the presence or absence of artificial saliva, were exposed to various wavelengths of light for different time periods (1-90 min). Dual activity of blue LED and far-UVC lights were virucidal for most wet and dried FIPV within 4 to 16 min on all matrices. Individual action of blue LED and far-UVC lights were virucidal for wet FIPV but required longer irradiation times (8-90 min) to reach a 4-log reduction. In comparison, LED (265 nm) and germicidal UVC (254 nm) were virucidal on almost all matrices for both wet and dried FIPV within 1 min exposure. UVC was more effective for the disinfection of surfaces as compared to blue LED and far-UVC individually or together. However, dual action of blue LED and far-UVC was virucidal. This combination of lights could be used as a safer alternative to traditional UVC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Validation of an Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay and Commercial Q Fever Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Use in Macropods
    (American Society for Microbiology, 2022-07) Tolpinrud A; Stenos J; Chaber A-L; Devlin JM; Herbert C; Pas A; Dunowska M; Stevenson MA; Firestone SM; Barrs, VR
    Kangaroos are considered to be an important reservoir of Q fever in Australia, although there is limited knowledge on the true prevalence and distribution of coxiellosis in Australian macropod populations. Serological tests serve as useful surveillance tools, but formal test validation is needed to be able to estimate true seroprevalence rates, and few tests have been validated to screen wildlife species for Q fever. In this study, we modified and optimized a phase-specific indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the detection of IgG antibodies against Coxiella burnetii in macropod sera. The assay was validated against the commercially available ID Screen Q fever indirect multispecies enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (IDVet, Grabels, France) to estimate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each assay, using Bayesian latent class analysis. A direct comparison of the two tests was performed by testing 303 serum samples from 10 macropod populations from the east coast of Australia and New Zealand. The analysis indicated that the IFA had relatively high diagnostic sensitivity (97.6% [95% credible interval [CrI], 88.0 to 99.9]) and diagnostic specificity (98.5% [95% CrI, 94.4 to 99.9]). In comparison, the ELISA had relatively poor diagnostic sensitivity (42.1% [95% CrI, 33.7 to 50.8]) and similar diagnostic specificity (99.2% [95% CrI, 96.4 to 100]) using the cutoff values recommended by the manufacturer. The estimated true seroprevalence of C. burnetii exposure in the macropod populations included in this study ranged from 0% in New Zealand and Victoria, Australia, up to 94.2% in one population from New South Wales, Australia.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Prevalence of human papillomaviruses in the mouths of New Zealand women.
    (25/09/2015) Lucas-Roxburgh R; Benschop J; Dunowska M; Perrott M
    AIM: Human papillomavirus (HPV) in the oral cavity has been retrospectively associated with an increased risk of developing HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of oral HPV infection in a local population of New Zealand women aged 18 to 25 years, including determination of HPV genotypes, and to assess potential risk factors for oral HPV infection using participant questionnaire responses. METHODS: Oral brushings and questionnaire responses were collected from 234 women recruited from sexual health and student health centres. Questions covered age, ethnicity, sexual partners, alcohol consumption and smoking. PGMY primers were used for HPV detection by PCR, and results confirmed by sequencing and the cobas® 4800 HPV system. RESULTS: The prevalence of HPV infection was 3.2% of 216 women (95% CI: 1.6%-6.5%). Samples from two women (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.3%-3.3%) contained oncogenic HPV, and another five (2.3%, 95% CI: 1.0%-5.3%) were positive for HPV 13. No significant associations were found between putative risk factors and the presence of oral HPV infection. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HPV in the oral cavity of New Zealand woman was comparable to results of other studies, but showed an unusual distribution of HPV types. The comparatively high detection rate of HPV 13 suggests that further work into clinical significance of oral HPV 13 infection is warranted.