Journal Articles

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Laven RSubject: search.filters.subject.Dairy cattle

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A comparative study between milk- and serum-based antibody detection assays for Johne's disease in New Zealand dairy cattle
    (Elsevier B.V., 2025-08-27) Venkatesh KM; Lopez-Villalobos N; Gupta SK; Udy GB; Laven R; Chiu S-J; Bugde P; Furuya Y; Dukkipati VSR
    Dairy cattle are affected by Johne's disease. It is caused by Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP). Suboptimal diagnostic tests add more to the productivity loss resulting from this disease. Agreement between and within different commercial kits is crucial in the decision-making process of disease surveillance programmes. This study compared two ELISAs, that is, Johne's disease commercial antibody detection kits (A and B), using milk and serum samples from New Zealand dairy cattle. These results were also compared with a subset of faecal PCR results. Five scenarios were considered for the comparison of ELISA tests. The point estimates of kappa coefficients (k) between the serum (0.84–0.94) assays were higher than the milk assays (0.59–0.82). The point estimates of kappa coefficients between serum and milk ELISA outcomes were higher for kit B (k = 0.79–0.86) than for kit A (k = 0.55–0.79). The point estimates of kappa coefficients between the ELISA and faecal PCR outcomes varied between 0.43 and 0.74. ELISA tests had point estimates of sensitivity ranging from 0.67 to 0.88 and specificity from 0.62 to 0.93, relative to the faecal PCR test. Results suggest that serum provides a better choice of sample type when both commercial kits A and B are used for Johne's disease surveillance of dairy cattle in New Zealand. Milk assays can be cost-effective to diagnose MAP-positive animals; kit B can be best suited for New Zealand conditions, provided the repeatability of the results is validated.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Measuring hoof horn haemorrhage in heifers: A history.
    (Elsevier B.V., 2024-06-27) Laven R; Laven L
    Understanding the aetiology and pathogenesis of claw-horn disease (CHD) is essential for developing prevention/treatment programmes. Haemorrhages in the hoof horn (i.e. white line/sole haemorrhages) are an important part of the pathogenesis of CHD, being precursors to and predictors of lesions such as white-line disease and sole ulcer. Understanding haemorrhage development can provide useful information about the aetiology and pathogenesis of CHD. The development of hoof horn haemorrhages is best studied in cattle without previous claw-horn damage, as previous history of damage can markedly alter the hoof's response to stressors. Since the early 1990s, many prospective studies of the risk factors associated with CHD have been undertaken in late pregnant and early lactation heifers, which have a low risk of having had CHD but which are exposed to the same risk factors as lactating cows. Those studies have used a range of methods to assess hoof horn haemorrhages, with the principal focus, particularly initially (but also more recently), being on measuring lesion severity. However, as the science developed it became clear that measuring lesion extent was also important and that combining severity and extent in a single measure was the best approach to assess hoof horn haemorrhages. Studies of hoof horn haemorrhage in heifers have significantly increased our understanding of CHD, demonstrating the importance of housing and the relative lack of importance of post-calving nutrition. Most importantly, they have shown the importance of parturition as a risk factor for CHD, and how parturition interacts with other risk factors to accentuate their effect. The use of such studies has decreased in recent years, despite recent research showing that we still have much to learn from prospective studies of hoof horn haemorrhages in heifers.