Journal Articles
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Measurement error of self-paced exercise performance in athletic women is not affected by ovulatory status or ambient environment(American Physiological Society, 2021-11) Zheng H; Badenhorst CE; Lei T-H; Muhamed AMC; Liao Y-H; Amano T; Fujii N; Nishiyasu T; Kondo N; Mündel TMeasurement error(s) of exercise tests for women are severely lacking in the literature. The purpose of this investigation was to 1) determine whether ovulatory status or ambient environment were moderating variables when completing a 30-min self-paced work trial and 2) provide test-retest norms specific to athletic women. A retrospective analysis of three heat stress studies was completed using 33 female participants (31 ± 9 yr, 54 ± 10 mL·min−1·kg−1) that yielded 130 separate trials. Participants were classified as ovulatory (n = 19), anovulatory (n = 4), and oral contraceptive pill users (n = 10). Participants completed trials ∼2 wk apart in their (quasi-) early follicular and midluteal phases in two of moderate (1.3 ± 0.1 kPa, 20.5 ± 0.5°C, 18 trials), warm-dry (2.2 ± 0.2 kPa, 34.1 ± 0.2°C, 46 trials), or warm-humid (3.4 ± 0.1 kPa, 30.2 ± 1.1°C, 66 trials) environments. We quantified reliability using limits of agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and coefficient of variation (CV). Test-retest reliability was high, clinically valid (ICC = 0.90, P < 0.01), and acceptable with a mean CV of 4.7%, SEM of 3.8 kJ (2.1 W), and reliable bias of −2.1 kJ (−1.2 W). The various ovulatory status and contrasting ambient conditions had no appreciable effect on reliability. These results indicate that athletic women can perform 30-min self-paced work trials ∼2 wk apart with an acceptable and low variability irrespective of their hormonal status or heat-stressful environments. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study highlights that aerobically trained women perform 30-min self-paced work trials ∼2 wk apart with acceptably low variability and their hormonal/ovulatory status and the introduction of greater ambient heat and humidity do not moderate this measurement error.Item Reliability of a 60-min treadmill running protocol in the heat: The journal Temperature toolbox(Taylor and Francis Group, 2022-11-11) Mündel T; Gilmour S; Kruger M; Thomson JWe determined the reliability of a 60-min treadmill protocol in the heat when spaced >4 weeks apart, longer than the test–retest duration of 1 week found in the literature. Nine unacclimated, trained males (age: 31 ± 8 y; VO2peak: 60 ± 6 ml∙kg−1∙min−1) undertook a 15 min self-paced time-trial pre-loaded with 45 min of running at 70% of individual ventilatory threshold (11.2 ± 0.3 km∙h−1) in 30 ± 1°C (53 ± 5% relative humidity). They repeated this following 40 ± 14 and 76 ± 26 days, with pre-trial standardization of diet and exercise for 48 h. When considering trial 1 as a familiarization, change in core temperature (∆Tcore) during the first 45 min (∆2.0 ± 0.2°C) between trials 2 and 3 yielded bias and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of −0.10 ± 0.43°C, standard error of measurement (SEM) of 0.13°C and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.75, more reliable than measures of baseline Tcore (36.9 ± 0.2°C; LoA: −0.23 ± 0.90°C; SEM: 0.22°C; ICC: 0.03) and Tcore at 45 min during exercise (38.9 ± 0.4°C; LoA: 0.32 ± 1.12°C; SEM: 0.28°C; ICC: 0.15). The coefficient of variation (CV) between trials 2 and 3 for distance run during the 15 min time-trial was 2.1 ± 2.0% with LoA of 0.001 ± 0.253 km and SEM of 0.037 km. This protocol is reliable spaced ~5 weeks apart when considering the most commonly accepted limit of <5% CV for performance, reinforced by reliability of the ΔTcore being 0.1 ± 0.4°C.