Journal Articles
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915
Browse
7 results
Search Results
Item Area-based socioeconomic deprivation is associated with cognitive decline in midlife to early late-life New Zealanders without cognitive impairment(Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association, 2025-01-09) Röhr S; Gibson R; Alpass FBackground Research identified individual-level socioeconomic factors as key determinants of cognitive health. This study investigated the effect of area-based socioeconomic deprivation on cognitive outcomes in midlife to early late-life New Zealanders without cognitive impairment. Understanding geographical dimensions of socioeconomic determinants of cognitive health is important from an equity perspective. Method Data stemmed from a subsample of the New Zealand Health, Work and Retirement Study, a cohort study on ageing. In 2010, 1,001 participants aged 49-84 years completed face-to-face interviews and were reassessed two years later. Cognitive functioning was measured using Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination–Revised, adapted for culturally acceptable use in New Zealand. Area-based socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the New Zealand Deprivation Index (NZDep2006). Linear mixed-effects models analysed the association between area-based socioeconomic deprivation and cognitive outcomes, controlling for individual-level socioeconomic (age, age², gender, education, ethnicity [Māori, Indigenous people of New Zealand, and Non-Māori, mostly of European descent], marital status, employment, net personal income), lifestyle and health variables (Lifestyle for Brain Health/LIBRA index, social loneliness). Result The analysis included 783 participants (54.7% female, mean age 62.7 years, 25.0% Māori). Individuals with cognitive impairment at baseline (n = 69) and older than 75 years were excluded (n = 79). Further attrition was due to missing data. At baseline, 39.7% resided in low deprivation areas, 39.0% in moderate, and 21.3% in high deprivation areas. The unadjusted model indicated a significant association between higher area-based socioeconomic deprivation and lower cognitive functioning (B = -0.16, 95%CI: -0.22,-0.10; p < .001) and cognitive decline (B = -0.12, 95%CI: -0.21;-0.03; p = .015). The adjusted model yielded similar results for cognitive functioning (B = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.15;-0.01; p = .050) and cognitive decline (B = -0.12, 95%CI: -0.20;-0.04, p = .013) (Fig. 1). Influential covariates included gender, education, and lifestyle (LIBRA). Conclusion This study demonstrated a relationship between higher area-based socioeconomic deprivation and lower cognitive functioning, along with cognitive decline, in cognitively unimpaired New Zealanders aged 48 to 75 years. These findings emphasize the importance of considering neighbourhood characteristics and broader socioeconomic factors in strategies aimed at mitigating cognitive health disparities and reducing the impact of dementia in disadvantaged communities.Item Higher socioeconomic deprivation in areas predicts cognitive decline in New Zealanders without cognitive impairment(Springer Nature Limited, 2024-11-16) Röhr S; Gibson RH; Alpass FMPrevious studies identified individual-level socioeconomic factors as key determinants of cognitive health. This study investigated the effect of area-based socioeconomic deprivation on cognitive outcomes in midlife to early late-life New Zealanders without cognitive impairment at baseline. Data stemmed from a subsample of the New Zealand Health, Work and Retirement Study, a cohort study on ageing, who completed face-to-face interviews and were reassessed two years later. Cognitive functioning was measured using Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised, adapted for culturally acceptable use in Aotearoa New Zealand. Area-based socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the New Zealand Deprivation Index (NZDep2006). Linear mixed-effects models analysed the association between area-based socioeconomic deprivation and cognitive outcomes. The analysis included 783 participants without cognitive impairment at baseline (54.7% female, mean age 62.7 years, 25.0% Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand). There was an association between higher area-based socioeconomic deprivation and lower cognitive functioning (B = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.15;-0.01; p = .050) and cognitive decline (B = -0.12, 95%CI: -0.20;-0.04, p = .013) over two years, while controlling for covariates. The findings emphasise the importance of considering neighbourhood characteristics and broader socioeconomic factors in strategies aimed at mitigating cognitive health disparities and reducing the impact of dementia in disadvantaged communities.Item Trajectory of Cognitive Decline Before and After Stroke in 14 Population Cohorts(American Medical Association, 2024-10-02) Lo JW; Crawford JD; Lipnicki DM; Lipton RB; Katz MJ; Preux P-M; Guerchet M; d'Orsi E; Quialheiro A; Rech CR; Ritchie K; Skoog I; Najar J; Sterner TR; Rolandi E; Davin A; Rossi M; Riedel-Heller SG; Pabst A; Röhr S; Ganguli M; Jacobsen E; Snitz BE; Anstey KJ; Aiello AE; Brodaty H; Kochan NA; Chen Y-C; Chen J-H; Sanchez-Juan P; Del Ser T; Valentí M; Lobo A; De-la-Cámara C; Lobo E; Sachdev PSIMPORTANCE: Poststroke cognitive impairment is common, but the cognitive trajectory following a first stroke, relative to prestroke cognitive function, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To map the trajectory of cognitive function before any stroke and after stroke in global cognition and in 4 cognitive domains, as well as to compare the cognitive trajectory prestroke in stroke survivors with the trajectory of individuals without incident stroke over follow-up. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study used harmonized and pooled data from 14 population-based cohort studies included in the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium collaboration. These studies were conducted from 1993 to 2019 across 11 countries among community-dwelling older adults without a history of stroke or dementia. For this study, linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate trajectories of cognitive function poststroke relative to a stroke-free cognitive trajectory. The full model adjusted for demographic and vascular risk factors. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to March 2024. EXPOSURE: Incident stroke. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was global cognition, defined as the standardized average of 4 cognitive domains (language, memory, processing speed, and executive function). Cognitive domain scores were formed by selecting the most commonly administered test within each domain and standardizing the scores. RESULTS: The study included 20 860 participants (12 261 [58.8%] female) with a mean (SD) age of 72.9 (8.0) years and follow-up of 7.51 (4.2) years. Incident stroke was associated with a substantial acute decline in global cognition (-0.25 SD; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.17 SD), the Mini-Mental State Examination, and all cognitive domains (ranging from -0.17 SD to -0.22 SD), as well as accelerated decline in global cognition (-0.038 SD per year; 95% CI, -0.057 to -0.019 SD per year) and all domains except memory (ranging from -0.020 to -0.055 SD per year), relative to a stroke-free cognitive trajectory. There was no significant difference in prestroke slope in stroke survivors compared with the rate of decline in individuals without stroke in all cognitive measures. The mean rate of decline without a previous stroke was -0.049 SD per year (95% CI, -0.051 to -0.047 SD) in global cognition. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study using pooled data from 14 cohorts, incident stroke was associated with acute and accelerated long-term cognitive decline in older stroke survivors.Item Social connections and risk of incident mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and mortality in 13 longitudinal cohort studies of ageing.(Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer’s Association., 2023-11) Mahalingam G; Samtani S; Lam BCP; Lipnicki DM; Lima-Costa MF; Blay SL; Castro-Costa E; Shifu X; Guerchet M; Preux P-M; Gbessemehlan A; Skoog I; Najar J; Sterner TR; Scarmeas N; Yannakoulia M; Dardiotis T; Kim K-W; Riedel-Heller S; Röhr S; Pabst A; Shahar S; Numbers K; Ganguli M; Hughes TF; Chang C-CH; Crowe M; Ng TP; Gwee X; Chua DQL; Rymaszewska J; Wolf-Ostermann K; Welmer A-K; Stafford J; Mélis R; Vernooij-Dassen M; Jeon Y-H; Sachdev PS; Brodaty H; SHARED consortium for the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC)INTRODUCTION: Previous meta-analyses have linked social connections and mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and mortality. However, these used aggregate data from North America and Europe and examined a limited number of social connection markers. METHODS: We used individual participant data (N = 39271, Mage = 70.67 (40-102), 58.86% female, Meducation = 8.43 years, Mfollow-up = 3.22 years) from 13 longitudinal ageing studies. A two-stage meta-analysis of Cox regression models examined the association between social connection markers with our primary outcomes. RESULTS: We found associations between good social connections structure and quality and lower risk of incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI); between social structure and function and lower risk of incident dementia and mortality. Only in Asian cohorts, being married/in a relationship was associated with reduced risk of dementia, and having a confidante was associated with reduced risk of dementia and mortality. DISCUSSION: Different aspects of social connections - structure, function, and quality - are associated with benefits for healthy aging internationally. HIGHLIGHTS: Social connection structure (being married/in a relationship, weekly community group engagement, weekly family/friend interactions) and quality (never lonely) were associated with lower risk of incident MCI. Social connection structure (monthly/weekly friend/family interactions) and function (having a confidante) were associated with lower risk of incident dementia. Social connection structure (living with others, yearly/monthly/weekly community group engagement) and function (having a confidante) were associated with lower risk of mortality. Evidence from 13 longitudinal cohort studies of ageing indicates that social connections are important targets for reducing risk of incident MCI, incident dementia, and mortality. Only in Asian cohorts, being married/in a relationship was associated with reduced risk of dementia, and having a confidante was associated with reduced risk of dementia and mortality. Highlights Social connection structure (being married/in a relationship, weekly community group engagement, weekly family/friend interactions) and quality (never lonely) were associated with lower risk of incident MCI. Social connection structure (monthly/weekly friend/family interactions) and function (having a confidante) were associated with lower risk of incident dementia. Social connection structure (living with others, yearly/monthly/weekly community group engagement) and function (having a confidante) were associated with lower risk of mortality. Evidence from 13 longitudinal cohort studies of ageing indicates that social connections are important targets for reducing risk of incident MCI, incident dementia, and mortality. Only in Asian cohorts, being married/in a relationship was associated with reduced risk of dementia, and having a confidante was associated with reduced risk of dementia and mortality.Item Associations between social connections and cognition: a global collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis(Elsevier B.V, 2022-11) Samtani S; Mahalingam G; Lam BCP; Lipnicki DM; Lima-Costa MF; Blay SL; Castro-Costa E; Shifu X; Guerchet M; Preux P-M; Gbessemehlan A; Skoog I; Najar J; Rydberg Sterner T; Scarmeas N; Kim K-W; Riedel-Heller S; Röhr S; Pabst A; Shahar S; Numbers K; Ganguli M; Jacobsen E; Hughes TF; Crowe M; Ng TP; Maddock J; Marseglia A; Mélis R; Szcześniak D; Wiegelmann H; Vernooij-Dassen M; Jeon Y-H; Sachdev PS; Brodaty H; SHARED consortium for the Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC)Background Poor social connections (eg, small networks, infrequent interactions, and loneliness) are modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline. Existing meta-analyses are limited by reporting aggregate responses, a focus on global cognition, and combining social measures into single constructs. We aimed to investigate the association between social connection markers and the rate of annual change in cognition (ie, global and domain-specific), as well as sex differences, using an individual participant data meta-analysis. Methods We harmonised data from 13 longitudinal cohort studies of ageing in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they had baseline data for social connection markers and at least two waves of cognitive scores. Follow-up periods ranged from 0 years to 15 years across cohorts. We included participants with cognitive data for at least two waves and social connection data for at least one wave. We then identified and excluded people with dementia at baseline. Primary outcomes were annual rates of change in global cognition and cognitive domain scores over time until final follow-up within each cohort study analysed by use of an individual participant data meta-analysis. Linear mixed models within cohorts used baseline social connection markers as predictors of the primary outcomes. Effects were pooled in two stages using random-effects meta-analyses. We assessed the primary outcomes in the main (partially adjusted) and fully adjusted models. Partially adjusted models controlled for age, sex, and education; fully adjusted models additionally controlled for diabetes, hypertension, smoking, cardiovascular risk, and depression. Findings Of the 40 006 participants in the 13 cohort studies, we excluded 1392 people with dementia at baseline. 38 614 individual participants were included in our analyses. For the main models, being in a relationship or married predicted slower global cognitive decline (b=0·010, 95% CI 0·000–0·019) than did being single or never married; living with others predicted slower global cognitive (b=0·007, 0·002–0·012), memory (b=0·017, 0·006–0·028), and language (b=0·008, 0·000–0·015) decline than did living alone; and weekly interactions with family and friends (b=0·016, 0·006–0·026) and weekly community group engagement (b=0·030, 0·007–0·052) predicted slower memory decline than did no interactions and no engagement. Never feeling lonely predicted slower global cognitive (b=0·047, 95% CI 0·018–0·075) and executive function (b=0·047, 0·017–0·077) decline than did often feeling lonely. Degree of social support, having a confidante, and relationship satisfaction did not predict cognitive decline across global cognition or cognitive domains. Heterogeneity was low (I2=0·00–15·11%) for all but two of the significant findings (association between slower memory decline and living with others [I2=58·33%] and community group engagement, I2=37·54–72·19%), suggesting robust results across studies. Interpretation Good social connections (ie, living with others, weekly community group engagement, interacting weekly with family and friends, and never feeling lonely) are associated with slower cognitive decline. Funding EU Joint Programme–Neurodegenerative Disease Research grant, funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, and the US National Institute on Aging of the US National Institutes of Health.Item Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study(BioMed Central Ltd, 2020-12-18) Röhr S; Pabst A; Riedel-Heller SG; Jessen F; Turana Y; Handajani YS; Brayne C; Matthews FE; Stephan BCM; Lipton RB; Katz MJ; Wang C; Guerchet M; Preux P-M; Mbelesso P; Ritchie K; Ancelin M-L; Carrière I; Guaita A; Davin A; Vaccaro R; Kim KW; Han JW; Suh SW; Shahar S; Din NC; Vanoh D; van Boxtel M; Köhler S; Ganguli M; Jacobsen EP; Snitz BE; Anstey KJ; Cherbuin N; Kumagai S; Chen S; Narazaki K; Ng TP; Gao Q; Gwee X; Brodaty H; Kochan NA; Trollor J; Lobo A; López-Antón R; Santabárbara J; Crawford JD; Lipnicki DM; Sachdev PS; for Cohort Studies of Memory in an International Consortium (COSMIC)Background Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is recognized as a risk stage for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other dementias, but its prevalence is not well known. We aimed to use uniform criteria to better estimate SCD prevalence across international cohorts. Methods We combined individual participant data for 16 cohorts from 15 countries (members of the COSMIC consortium) and used qualitative and quantitative (Item Response Theory/IRT) harmonization techniques to estimate SCD prevalence. Results The sample comprised 39,387 cognitively unimpaired individuals above age 60. The prevalence of SCD across studies was around one quarter with both qualitative harmonization/QH (23.8%, 95%CI = 23.3–24.4%) and IRT (25.6%, 95%CI = 25.1–26.1%); however, prevalence estimates varied largely between studies (QH 6.1%, 95%CI = 5.1–7.0%, to 52.7%, 95%CI = 47.4–58.0%; IRT: 7.8%, 95%CI = 6.8–8.9%, to 52.7%, 95%CI = 47.4–58.0%). Across studies, SCD prevalence was higher in men than women, in lower levels of education, in Asian and Black African people compared to White people, in lower- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries, and in studies conducted in later decades. Conclusions SCD is frequent in old age. Having a quarter of older individuals with SCD warrants further investigation of its significance, as a risk stage for AD and other dementias, and of ways to help individuals with SCD who seek medical advice. Moreover, a standardized instrument to measure SCD is needed to overcome the measurement variability currently dominant in the field.Item Lifestyle Aspects As A Predictor Of Pain Among Oldest-Old Primary Care Patients – A Longitudinal Cohort Study(Dove Medical Press, 2019-11) Mallon T; Eisele M; König H-H; Brettschneider C; Röhr S; Pabst A; Weyerer S; Werle J; Mösch E; Weeg D; Fuchs A; Pentzek M; Heser K; Wiese B; Kleineidam L; Wagner M; Riedel-Heller S; Maier W; Scherer MPurpose: Dealing with the high prevalence of pain among the oldest-old (+75) is becoming a major health issue. Therefore, the aim of the study was to uncover health-related lifestyle behaviors (HLB) and age-related comorbidities which may predict, influence and prevent pain in old age. Patients and methods: In this longitudinal cohort study, data were obtained initially from 3.327 individuals aged 75+ from over 138 general practitioners (GP) during structured clinical interviews in 2003. Nine follow-ups (FU) were assessed until 2017. Available data from 736 individuals scoring in FU3 and FU7 were included in this analysis. Data were assembled in an ambulatory setting at participant’s homes. Associations were tested using a linear regression model (model 1) and ordered logistic regression model (model 2). Results: Statistical analyses revealed increased likelihood to experience pain for participants with comorbidities such as peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (coef. 13.51, P>t = 0.00) or chronic back pain (CBP) (coef. 6.64, P>t = 0.003) or higher body mass index (BMI) (coef. 0.57, P>t = 0.015) and, female gender (coef. 6.00, SE 3.0, t = 2.02, P>t = 0.044). Participants with medium education and former smokers showed significantly lower pain rating (coef. −5.05, P>t = 0.026; coef. −5.27, P>t = 0.026). Suffering from chronic back pain (OR = 2.03), osteoarthritis (OR = 1.49) or depressive symptoms (OR = 1.10) raised the odds to experience impairments in daily living due to pain. Physical activity showed no significant results. Conclusion: Chronic conditions such as PAD, or CBP, female gender and higher BMI may increase the risk of experiencing more pain while successful smoking cessation can lower pain ratings at old age. Early and consistent support through GPs should be given to older patients in order to prevent pain at old age.