Journal Articles

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Williams MNSubject: search.filters.subject.Humans

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Acceptance and commitment therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (ACTion-mTBI): a quasiexperimental feasibility study
    (BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2025-02-16) Faulkner J; Prouty D; Devlin L; Appleton D; Roche M; Below K; Moffat J; Snell D; Williams MN; Barker-Collo S; Theadom A
    OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of recruiting, implementing and delivering an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) intervention for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (ACTion-mTBI) within a multidisciplinary outpatient mTBI rehabilitation services. The study also aimed to conduct a preliminary investigation of group differences between ACTion-mTBI and an equivalent cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention on various outcome measures and psychological treatment targets. DESIGN: A two-arm quasiexperimental feasibility study. SETTING: Five mTBI rehabilitation clinics throughout New Zealand. INTERVENTION: Psychologists working in mTBI rehabilitation clinics throughout New Zealand were trained to deliver ACTion-mTBI or CBT. Eligible participants were assigned to either of these interventions based on the psychologist available at the clinic they were referred to. ACTion-mTBI is a five sessions intervention that incorporates all six components of the ACT model. The CBT intervention is an equivalent intervention and incorporating all four components of the CBT model. Both interventions are adapted for an mTBI context. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were related to the feasibility of ACTion-mTBI. This included recruitment, retention and treatment adherence of participants, study procedure and fidelity of treatment delivery. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To explore group differences between ACTion-mTBI and CBT on functional disability, postconcussion symptoms, mental health, valued living and psychological flexibility. RESULTS: The intervention proved feasible to implement with community-based mTBI rehabilitation services. Attrition rates were comparable between the two psychological interventions and fidelity to the treatments was high. At post-treatment, when covarying pretreatment scores, ACTion-mTBI had a significantly greater improvement in functional disability than CBT (moderate effect). ACTion-mTBI also had a significantly greater reduction in postconcussion symptoms, anxiety and stress. Promisingly, significant improvements in psychological flexibility was also found post-treatment. There were no group differences on depressive symptoms and valued living. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a full clinical trial of ACTion-mTBI for individuals with mTBI is feasible and warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN1262100059482.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    People do change their beliefs about conspiracy theories-but not often.
    (Springer Nature Limited, 2024-02-15) Williams MN; Ling M; Kerr JR; Hill SR; Marques MD; Mawson H; Clarke EJR
    Recent research has produced a significant body of knowledge about the antecedents and consequences of individual differences in belief in conspiracy theories. What is less clear, however, is the extent to which individuals' beliefs in conspiracy theories vary over time (i.e., within-person variation). In this descriptive and exploratory study, we therefore aimed to describe within-person variability in belief in conspiracy theories. We collected data from 498 Australians and New Zealanders using an online longitudinal survey, with data collected at monthly intervals over 6 months (March to September 2021). Our measure of conspiracy theories included items describing ten conspiracy theories with responses on a 5-point Likert scale. While there was substantial between-person variance, there was much less within-person variance (intraclass r = 0.91). This suggests that beliefs in conspiracy theories were highly stable in our sample. This stability implies that longitudinal studies testing hypotheses about the causes and consequences of belief in conspiracy theories may require large samples of participants and time points to achieve adequate power. It also implies that explanations of belief in conspiracy theories need to accommodate the observation that beliefs in such theories vary much more between people than within people.