Journal Articles

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/7915

Browse

Has files: YesSubject: search.filters.subject.interpersonal communication

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Communication accommodation theory in quantitative research: Toward a standardized operationalization of core constructs
    (Taylor and Francis Group on behalf of the National Communication Association, 2025-10-13) Fowler C; Gasiorek J; Giles H
    Communication accommodation theory (CAT) has been an influential theory for 50 years. However, its core constructs have not been operationalized consistently in quantitative research. In this manuscript, we report on efforts to standardize and validate a multi-dimensional instrument to measure constructs of theoretical importance in CAT. In Study 1 (n = 416), we detail the process through which items drawn from previous research were collated and describe six factors confirmed through factor analysis of the “other-report” form of the instrument. In Study 2 (n = 398), we replicate the factor structure from Study 1 and demonstrate its construct validity. In Study 3 (n = 356), we show the instrument can also serve as a valid self-report measure.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    An Integrative Approach to the Prediction of Argumentativeness
    (Taylor and Francis Group on behalf of the Southern States Communication Association, 2025-05-29) Croucher SM; Kelly S; Separa LA; Yotes TS; Zhou Z; Singh R; Ashwell D; Condon SM
    This study explored the extent to which demographics (age and level of education), the “Big Three,” (extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism), cognitive dispositions (locus of control and resilience), and social personal dispositions (Machiavellianism) combine to predict argumentativeness. Based on a representative sample of 877 participants from the United States, the results revealed that when taken together, previously established effects of some of these variables on attitude toward arguing are verified, although some are not consistent. Level of education and locus of control did not affect attitude toward approaching an argument as in the previous research. Implications for future research are discussed, with an emphasis on future research taking a more comprehensive approach to the study of communication.