• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Hindgut digestibility in the dog (Canis familiaris) : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Animal Science at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    01_front.pdf (322.1Kb)
    02_whole.pdf (1.808Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    Digestibility trials are important tools used by nutritionists to establish the nutrient requirements of an animal . The most common method used is total faecal collection , which involves the total collection of faeces over a limited period of time. Digestibility trials can also use indigestible markers, such as chromium oxide and titanium oxide , which eliminate the need for a total faecal collection and instead uses sub-sampling methods The major aim of this thesis was to compare the suitability of chromium oxide (Cr203) and titanium dioxide (Ti02) as indigestible markers in dogs. Due to constraints in the study design (limited space in the facility and therefore a requirement to house dogs in pairs), it needed to be established if Ti02 interfered with the chemical analysis of Cr203 before any animal trials were undertaken . Different concentrations of both markers were added to freeze dried dog faeces. The indigestible markers were then analysed for in the laboratory and recoveries calculated . lt was established that there was no interference of the analysis by either marker. After a pilot study confirmed that coprophagy did not occur in the dogs, the first study (Chapter 2) used 12 entire female Harrier hounds housed in pairs in 6 concrete floor pens. The dogs were fed twice daily with one of 4 treatment diets; a high nutrient diet containing Cr203 or Ti02 or a low nutrient diet containing Cr203 or Ti02. Daily intake was recorded for each dog. Each dog received each of the 4 diets over 4 consecutive evaluation periods of 14 days each. This study showed that 100% recovery of markers was not achieved in the dogs. Recoveries of Cr203 were 58% and 76% respectively for high and low nutrient diets, and recoveries of Ti02 were 80% and 74% respectively for the same two diets . These results suggest that Ti02 is currently the best indigestible marker for use in dogs . Study 2 (Chapter 3) used 5 adult female Beagle dogs with surgically prepared ileal cannulas. The ileal cannulation was conducted according to the method of Walker et al. (1994), and the dogs were housed individually in floor pens in temperature controlled rooms. The dogs were fed 5 commercial AAFCO approved diets with free access to water. Dogs were randomised in a replicated 5x 5 Latin-square design with 14 day periods , consisting of a 10 day adaptation period and a 4 day ileal and faecal collection period. lt was found that there were significant differences between ileal and faecal digestibility of dry matter, crude protein, organic matter and carbohydrates of the nutrients that we tested, indicating that there was significant metabolism of nutrients in the hindgut of the dog .
    Date
    2006
    Author
    Singh, Ishwani
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/4892
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1