• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Monoclonal antibody production : a comparison of in vitro and in vivo methods and their use in Clostridial vaccine manufacture : a dissertation presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Veterinary Medicine at Massey University, Manawatu, New Zealand

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    01_front.pdf (155.3Kb)
    02_whole.pdf (1.268Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    The genus Clostridium contains rod-shaped, endospore forming, gram-positive bacteria that are obligate anaerobes (Delano, Mischler, & Underwood, 2002; Hatheway, 1990; Rood, 1997). Clostridial diseases are important diseases of livestock in New Zealand, and are considered by some to be the most economically important diseases of sheep and other livestock (Walker, 1992). They are characterized by systemic vascular failure and/or necrotizing enteritis within hours after exposure—a speed that out-paces a naïve individual’s ability to control and effectively counteract the toxin’s effects. Vaccination is an important management practice that can decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with Clostridial infections, and vaccination has been used safely and successfully in New Zealand livestock for many years. Vaccine manufacture and quality assurance (QA) often involves production of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) derived from culture of hybridoma cells. Traditionally, large numbers of animals have been used to support research, development, and manufacture of Clostridial vaccines (for use in toxin neutralization, vaccine challenge studies, and potency determination) and for MAb manufacture (ascites model). There is currently a great emphasis on finding ways to reduce, refine, and replace animal use in research. Studies were undertaken that involved MAb production techniques and assay development related to C. perfringens Type C beta toxin and Type D epsilon toxin. Two different methods for MAb production were evaluated: a traditional in vivo murine ascites method and an in vitro method based on use of a commercially available two chamber plastic bioreactor system (CELLine; Becton Dickinson). Two hybridoma lines with historic MAb activity against the lethal and dermo-necrotizing effects of epsilon toxin (EP82) and beta toxin (CP68) were cultured in each production system. In addition to comparing the quantity of MAbs produced by each method, a sandwich ELISA based on use of the anti-epsilon MAbs was developed. This ELISA was implemented for use as a diagnostic tool for internal investigation of batches of epsilon toxoid-containing vaccines that were identified as having low potency in the standard QA test (rabbit antibody induction) for potency. These studies showed that an in vitro method of hybridoma culture was more time and cost effective than conventional live animal ascites production, based on the total quantity of
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Bonistalli, Kathryn Nicole
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/5194
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1