• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Massey Documents by Type
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    In-flight aggression : a cabin crew and passenger perspective : a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Aviation at Massey University

    Icon
    View/Open Full Text
    01_front.pdf (3.356Mb)
    02_whole.pdf (61.62Mb)
    Export to EndNote
    Abstract
    In-flight aggression is the term used to describe aggressive behaviour during flights. The dangers such behaviour pose are evident when the lives of passengers and cabin crew are threatened. In the worst case scenario, passenger/s will barged into the cockpit and interfere with flight controls, causing the aircraft to crash while losing all lives onboard. This study investigates the magnitude of in-flight aggression and some of the triggers that lead passengers to it. It also examines the effectiveness of some measures and the environment which in-flight aggression manifest. The results showed that cabin crew were exposed to the serious dangers of in-flight aggression 6 times more than an average passenger. After September 11th, passengers became more aware of the dangers of in-flight aggression and were more willing to assist cabin crew should the need arise. Alcohol was found to be the top trigger of in-flight aggression and cabin crew intervention of such behaviour is most effective compared to other measures such as flight crew, other passengers, legislation, etc. Some aspects of airline policies and procedures related to the management of in-flight aggression require attention. Pre-flight and in-flight procedures and policies were only moderately effective and experienced cabin crew found them disappointing. Airlines encourages their crew to report incidents and have high safety standards which they expect cabin crew to adhere to strictly, failing which cabin crew are likely to face disciplinary actions. However the cabin crew were seldom informed about outcome of incidents and lessons drawn from incidents seldom led to policy or procedural improvements. Cabin crew believed that both physical and psychological passenger management techniques should be incorporated in training and many would like to be trained in self-defence although many airlines do not provide such training. There is some evidence that profiles of passenger and cabin crew can be used to predict a potential perpetrator and the effectiveness of a cabin crew managing an incident. Based on the finding, several recommendations were made to better manage in-flight aggression.
    Date
    2005
    Author
    Li, Bao Qing
    Rights
    The Author
    Publisher
    Massey University
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10179/8553
    Collections
    • Theses and Dissertations
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1
     

     

    Tweets by @Massey_Research
    Information PagesContent PolicyDepositing content to MROCopyright and Access InformationDeposit LicenseDeposit License SummaryTheses FAQFile FormatsDoctoral Thesis Deposit

    Browse

    All of MROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © Massey University
    | Contact Us | Feedback | Copyright Take Down Request | Massey University Privacy Statement
    DSpace software copyright © Duraspace
    v5.7-2020.1-beta1