Comparison of quinoa proteins modified by thermal acid hydrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis, and ultrasonication as Pickering emulsifiers

dc.citation.issuePart 2
dc.citation.volume339
dc.contributor.authorYang F
dc.contributor.authorLi B
dc.contributor.authorYe A
dc.contributor.authorGuo Q
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-25T19:59:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-01
dc.description.abstractThe poor functionality of seed storage proteins is the major factor limiting their practical utilization. Although thermal acid hydrolysis, enzymatic treatment, and ultrasonication enhance quinoa protein functionality, their effects are rarely compared under identical conditions. Herein, quinoa protein isolate (QPI) was extracted from air-classified quinoa flours without the defatting step, as this step greatly reduces extraction efficiency, and subsequently modified via thermal acid hydrolysis, moderate tryptic hydrolysis, and ultrasonication. The solubility, morphology, surface and emulsifying properties of QPI, acid-hydrolyzed QPI (AQPI), enzyme-hydrolyzed QPI (EQPI) and ultrasonication-modified QPI (UQPI) were evaluated to elucidate how these modifications influenced QPI performance as a Pickering emulsifier under identical conditions. The results showed that the solubility and wettability of all modified QPIs were improved. Both QPI and modified QPIs were able to form oil-in-water emulsions with an average droplet size of ∼13 μm. The interfacial protein concentration increased linearly with emulsifier concentration from 0.5 to 2 % w/w, with AQPI and EQPI exhibiting higher adsorption capacity than QPI and UQPI, which was ascribed to a contact angle closer to 90° (i.e., a balanced hydrophilic-hydrophobic interface). Over 14 days of storage, all emulsions stabilized by QPI and modified QPIs remained resistant to flocculation and coalescence due to high protein adsorption, with EQPI providing the smallest droplet size increase (12.5 to 15.3 μm). Increasing the concentration of QPI and modified QPIs improved the creaming stability of all emulsions. This study demonstrates that these modification methods, particularly moderate tryptic hydrolysis, effectively tailored quinoa proteins for Pickering emulsions.
dc.description.confidentialfalse
dc.edition.editionJanuary 2026
dc.identifier.citationYang F, Li B, Ye A, Guo Q. (2026). Comparison of quinoa proteins modified by thermal acid hydrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis, and ultrasonication as Pickering emulsifiers. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 339. Part 2.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.149872
dc.identifier.eissn1879-0003
dc.identifier.elements-typejournal-article
dc.identifier.issn0141-8130
dc.identifier.number149872
dc.identifier.piiS0141813025104297
dc.identifier.urihttps://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/74378
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.publisher.urihttps://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.massey.ac.nz/science/article/pii/S0141813025104297
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of Biological Macromolecules
dc.rights(c) The author/sen
dc.rights.licenseCC BY 4.0 CAUL Read and Publishen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectSeed storage protein
dc.subjectDefatting-free extraction
dc.subjectModification
dc.titleComparison of quinoa proteins modified by thermal acid hydrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis, and ultrasonication as Pickering emulsifiers
dc.typeJournal article
pubs.elements-id609175
pubs.organisational-groupOther

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
609175 PDF.pdf
Size:
3.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version.pdf

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
9.22 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections